Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs WAGSX
CNPFX vs WAGSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs WAGSX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$69.76
Change-$0.36 (-0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets159.04B
Wasatch Global Select Investor
Price$12.76
Change-$0.04 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.91M
CNPFX vs WAGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. WAGSX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and WAGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. WAGSX (12.9M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than WAGSX: CNPFX (0.65) vs WAGSX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than WAGSX: CNPFX (23 years) vs WAGSX (6 years). WAGSX (2.57) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. WAGSX (21.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAGSX: CNPFX (250) vs WAGSX (2000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.94 vs. WAGSX (5.54). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.99 vs. WAGSX (1.92).
| CNPFX | WAGSX | CNPFX / WAGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.36 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.57 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.926 | 5.717 | 261% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159B | 12.9M | 1,232,558% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.94 | 5.54 | 215% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.48 | 24.37 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.99 | 1.92 | 1,930% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.96 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement