Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs WAGSX
CNPFX vs WAGSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs WAGSX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$71.44
Change-$0.06 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets160.12B
Wasatch Global Select Investor
Price$12.91
Change-$0.07 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.07M
CNPFX vs WAGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. WAGSX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and WAGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. WAGSX (13.1M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than WAGSX: CNPFX (0.64) vs WAGSX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than WAGSX: CNPFX (23 years) vs WAGSX (6 years). WAGSX (2.57) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. WAGSX (21.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAGSX: CNPFX (250) vs WAGSX (2000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.13 vs. WAGSX (5.91). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.91 vs. WAGSX (5.22).
| CNPFX | WAGSX | CNPFX / WAGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.36 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.57 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.694 | 6.959 | 254% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 13.1M | 1,221,374% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.13 | 5.91 | 256% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.29 | 35.18 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.91 | 5.22 | 803% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.66 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement