Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs WAGSX
CNPFX vs WAGSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs WAGSX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$70.88
Change-$0.62 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets160.3B
Wasatch Global Select Investor
Price$11.96
Change+$0.02 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.94M
CNPFX vs WAGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. WAGSX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and WAGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. WAGSX (11.9M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than WAGSX: CNPFX (0.61) vs WAGSX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than WAGSX: CNPFX (23 years) vs WAGSX (6 years). WAGSX (2.57) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. WAGSX (21.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAGSX: CNPFX (250) vs WAGSX (2000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.29 vs. WAGSX (-3.94). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.73 vs. WAGSX (-14.08).
| CNPFX | WAGSX | CNPFX / WAGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.36 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.57 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.771 | -0.911 | -1,840% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 11.9M | 1,344,538% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.29 | -3.94 | -312% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.93 | 23.43 | 205% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.73 | -14.08 | -204% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers