Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs WAGSX
CNPFX vs WAGSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs WAGSX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$66.00
Change+$0.34 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets149.96B
Wasatch Global Select Investor
Price$13.13
Change+$0.11 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.92M
CNPFX vs WAGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. WAGSX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and WAGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 150B vs. WAGSX (14.9M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than WAGSX: CNPFX (0.68) vs WAGSX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than WAGSX: CNPFX (23 years) vs WAGSX (6 years). WAGSX (2.57) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). CNPFX (24.00) and WAGSX (24.00) have comparable annual turnover. CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAGSX: CNPFX (250) vs WAGSX (2000). WAGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.58 vs. CNPFX (11.04). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.49 vs. WAGSX (13.58).
| CNPFX | WAGSX | CNPFX / WAGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.36 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.57 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.731 | 8.782 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 150B | 14.9M | 1,006,711% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.04 | 13.58 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.19 | 32.09 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.49 | 13.58 | 335% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.25 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers