Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs WAGSX
CNPFX vs WAGSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs WAGSX
CNPFX vs WAGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. WAGSX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and WAGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. WAGSX (12.6M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than WAGSX: CNPFX (1.12) vs WAGSX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than WAGSX: CNPFX (24 years) vs WAGSX (7 years). WAGSX (2.81) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.83). WAGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. CNPFX (23.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAGSX: CNPFX (250) vs WAGSX (2000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.01 vs. WAGSX (-2.77). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.84 vs. WAGSX (-16.52).
| CNPFX | WAGSX | CNPFX / WAGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.36 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 2.81 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.300 | 2.850 | 256% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 12.6M | 1,301,587% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.01 | -2.77 | -505% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.66 | 20.52 | 218% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.84 | -16.52 | -126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.07 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers