Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs ZGFAX
CNPFX vs ZGFAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs ZGFAX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$68.78
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.49B
American Beacon Ninety One Gbl Frnchs Y
Price$19.60
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets438.4M
CNPFX vs ZGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. ZGFAX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and ZGFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. ZGFAX (438M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than ZGFAX: CNPFX (0.65) vs ZGFAX (0.20). CNPFX was incepted earlier than ZGFAX: CNPFX (23 years) vs ZGFAX (7 years). ZGFAX (0.94) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). ZGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. CNPFX (24.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFAX: CNPFX (250) vs ZGFAX (100000). ZGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.37 vs. CNPFX (11.76). ZGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 53.29 vs. CNPFX (42.78).
| CNPFX | ZGFAX | CNPFX / ZGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.85 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.94 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.311 | 11.922 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 438M | 35,616% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.20 | 320% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.76 | 12.37 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.12 | 48.43 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.78 | 53.29 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.09 | N/A | - |