Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs ZGFAX
CNPFX vs ZGFAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs ZGFAX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$64.46
Change-$0.73 (-1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets149.21B
American Beacon Ninety One Gbl Frnchs Y
Price$19.10
Change-$0.14 (-0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets423.71M
CNPFX vs ZGFAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. ZGFAX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and ZGFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 149B vs. ZGFAX (424M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than ZGFAX: CNPFX (0.73) vs ZGFAX (0.22). CNPFX was incepted earlier than ZGFAX: CNPFX (23 years) vs ZGFAX (7 years). ZGFAX (0.94) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). ZGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. CNPFX (24.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFAX: CNPFX (250) vs ZGFAX (100000). ZGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.08 vs. CNPFX (7.00). ZGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 61.12 vs. CNPFX (52.33).
| CNPFX | ZGFAX | CNPFX / ZGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.85 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.94 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.194 | 8.956 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 149B | 424M | 35,142% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 0.22 | 331% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.00 | 13.08 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.72 | 40.99 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.33 | 61.12 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.61 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement