Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs ZGFAX
CNPFX vs ZGFAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs ZGFAX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$66.01
Change-$0.79 (-1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets152.4B
American Beacon Ninety One Gbl Frnchs Y
Price$19.39
Change-$0.33 (-1.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets435.99M
CNPFX vs ZGFAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. ZGFAX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and ZGFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 152B vs. ZGFAX (436M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than ZGFAX: CNPFX (0.68) vs ZGFAX (0.21). CNPFX was incepted earlier than ZGFAX: CNPFX (23 years) vs ZGFAX (7 years). ZGFAX (0.94) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). ZGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. CNPFX (24.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFAX: CNPFX (250) vs ZGFAX (100000). ZGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.86 vs. CNPFX (8.98). ZGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 63.20 vs. CNPFX (50.14).
| CNPFX | ZGFAX | CNPFX / ZGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.85 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.94 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.748 | 12.493 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 152B | 436M | 34,862% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.21 | 328% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.98 | 15.86 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.46 | 50.89 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.14 | 63.20 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.62 | N/A | - |