Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs ZGFAX
CNPFX vs ZGFAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs ZGFAX
CNPFX vs ZGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. ZGFAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and ZGFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. ZGFAX (356M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than ZGFAX: CNPFX (1.12) vs ZGFAX (0.73). CNPFX was incepted earlier than ZGFAX: CNPFX (24 years) vs ZGFAX (8 years). ZGFAX (0.86) and CNPFX (0.83) have similar cost to investors . CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. ZGFAX (14.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFAX: CNPFX (250) vs ZGFAX (100000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.45 vs. ZGFAX (-3.76). ZGFAX (18.21) and CNPFX (17.46) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CNPFX | ZGFAX | CNPFX / ZGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.86 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.86 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.517 | -4.735 | -138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 356M | 48,315% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.73 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.45 | -3.76 | -358% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.14 | 23.37 | 180% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.46 | 18.21 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.23 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement