CNPOF vs GLASF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPOF is a Sell and GLASF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CNPOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGLASF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CNPOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- GLASF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CNPOF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLASF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CNPOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- GLASF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CNPOF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -15.71% price change this week, while GLASF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was +0.25% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -5.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.90%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-5.07% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
| CNPOF | GLASF | CNPOF / GLASF | |
| Capitalization | 13.3M | 204M | 7% |
| EBITDA | -163.44M | -24.02M | 680% |
| Gain YTD | 10.212 | 68.288 | 15% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 6.81M | 106M | 6% |
| Total Cash | 97.9M | 13.4M | 731% |
| Total Debt | 110M | 73.6M | 149% |
CNPOF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 37 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CNPOF | GLASF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 76% |
CNPOF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CNPOF and CBSTF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CNPOF and CBSTF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CNPOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNPOF | 100% | +3.93% | ||
| CBSTF - CNPOF | 26% Poorly correlated | -4.42% | ||
| JUSHF - CNPOF | 21% Poorly correlated | +14.10% | ||
| GLASF - CNPOF | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.38% | ||
| CRLBF - CNPOF | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.71% | ||
| CPHRF - CNPOF | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.51% | ||
More | ||||
GLASF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLASF has been loosely correlated with TSNDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLASF jumps, then TSNDF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLASF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLASF | 100% | -0.38% | ||
| TSNDF - GLASF | 63% Loosely correlated | +4.59% | ||
| GTBIF - GLASF | 62% Loosely correlated | +3.42% | ||
| TCNNF - GLASF | 60% Loosely correlated | +3.50% | ||
| VRNOF - GLASF | 58% Loosely correlated | -3.93% | ||
| CURLF - GLASF | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.91% | ||
More | ||||