Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNRWX vs FFAFX
CNRWX vs FFAFX Comparison
Open Charts CNRWX vs FFAFX
City National Rochdale US Cor Eq N
Price$26.96
Change+$0.12 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets371.86M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$86.13
Change+$0.46 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
CNRWX vs FFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. CNRWX (372M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than CNRWX: FFAFX (0.53) vs CNRWX (0.04). CNRWX was incepted earlier than FFAFX: CNRWX (13 years) vs FFAFX (5 years). CNRWX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. CNRWX (20.00). CNRWX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: CNRWX (0) vs FFAFX (250). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.25 vs. CNRWX (-6.59). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.98 vs. CNRWX (25.15).
| CNRWX | FFAFX | CNRWX / FFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.35 | 306% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.35 | 306% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.326 | 16.078 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 372M | 327B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 0.53 | 8% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.59 | 7.25 | -91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.23 | 64.80 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.15 | 36.98 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.92 | N/A | - |