CNS
Price
$76.20
Change
-$0.65 (-0.85%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.7B
81 days until earnings call
FNCSF
Price
$4.09
Change
+$0.21 (+5.41%)
Updated
Apr 23 closing price
Capitalization
172.5M
Ad is loading...

CNS vs FNCSF

Header iconCNS vs FNCSF Comparison
Open Charts CNS vs FNCSFBanner chart's image
Cohen & Steers
Price$76.20
Change-$0.65 (-0.85%)
Volume$99.6K
Capitalization3.7B
North American Financial 15 Split
Price$4.09
Change+$0.21 (+5.41%)
Volume$300
Capitalization172.5M
CNS vs FNCSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNS vs. FNCSF commentary
Apr 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNS is a StrongBuy and FNCSF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CNS: $76.20 vs. FNCSF: $4.09)
Brand notoriety: CNS and FNCSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNS: 41% vs. FNCSF: 19%
Market capitalization -- CNS: $3.7B vs. FNCSF: $172.5M
CNS [@Investment Managers] is valued at $3.7B. FNCSF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $172.5M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFNCSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CNS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FNCSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNS is a better buy in the long-term than FNCSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CNS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

CNS (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.61% price change this week, while FNCSF (@Investment Managers) price change was +4.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNS is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.64% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNS($3.7B) has a higher market cap than FNCSF($173M). CNS has higher P/E ratio than FNCSF: CNS (28.73) vs FNCSF (1.47). CNS YTD gains are higher at: -16.889 vs. FNCSF (-18.200). CNS has higher revenues than FNCSF: CNS (490M) vs FNCSF (-3.82M).
CNSFNCSFCNS / FNCSF
Capitalization3.7B173M2,139%
EBITDA184MN/A-
Gain YTD-16.889-18.20093%
P/E Ratio28.731.471,957%
Revenue490M-3.82M-12,840%
Total Cash265MN/A-
Total Debt140MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNS vs FNCSF: Fundamental Ratings
CNS
FNCSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
782
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3975
SMR RATING
1..100
2917
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6262
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5795
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNCSF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CNS (72) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FNCSF’s stock grew significantly faster than CNS’s over the last 12 months.

CNS's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNCSF (75) in the null industry. This means that CNS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNCSF’s over the last 12 months.

FNCSF's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as CNS (29) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FNCSF’s stock grew similarly to CNS’s over the last 12 months.

FNCSF's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as CNS (62) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FNCSF’s stock grew similarly to CNS’s over the last 12 months.

CNS's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNCSF (95) in the null industry. This means that CNS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNCSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TIEUX14.21N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Pathway Intl Eq
WPOPX12.55N/A
N/A
Weitz Partners III Opportunity Instl
LAMFX21.87N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth F
EKGYX37.05N/A
N/A
Allspring Special Global Small Cap Admin
NZDEUR0.53N/A
N/A
New Zealand Dollar - Euro

FNCSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNCSF and WNDLF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNCSF and WNDLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNCSF
1D Price
Change %
FNCSF100%
N/A
WNDLF - FNCSF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
APAM - FNCSF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
AMG - FNCSF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
SLFPY - FNCSF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNS - FNCSF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
More