Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNSAX vs MCOAX
CNSAX vs MCOAX Comparison
Open Charts CNSAX vs MCOAX
CNSAX vs MCOAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNSAX vs. MCOAX commentary
Sep 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNSAX is a StrongBuy and MCOAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCOAX has more cash in the bank: 1.88B vs. CNSAX (917M). MCOAX (1.94) and CNSAX (1.87) have matching dividends . CNSAX was incepted earlier than MCOAX: CNSAX (29 years) vs MCOAX (32 years). CNSAX (0.96) and MCOAX (0.93) have similar cost to investors . CNSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 114.00 vs. MCOAX (40.00). CNSAX (6%) and MCOAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. CNSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCOAX: CNSAX (1000) vs MCOAX (15000). MCOAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to CNSAX: MCOAX (25000) vs CNSAX (250). MCOAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.81 vs. CNSAX (10.89). MCOAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.53 vs. CNSAX (-8.68).
| CNSAX | MCOAX | CNSAX / MCOAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.93 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.93 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.635 | 18.158 | 86% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 15000 | 7% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | 25000 | 1% |
| Net Assets | 917M | 1.88B | 49% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.87 | 1.94 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.89 | 16.81 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.02 | 39.54 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.68 | 4.53 | -192% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.52 | 67.31 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers