Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNSFX vs MCOAX
CNSFX vs MCOAX Comparison
Open Charts CNSFX vs MCOAX
CNSFX vs MCOAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNSFX vs. MCOAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNSFX is a Hold and MCOAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCOAX has more cash in the bank: 1.84B vs. CNSFX (906M). CNSFX pays higher dividends than MCOAX: CNSFX (2.18) vs MCOAX (1.94). CNSFX was incepted earlier than MCOAX: CNSFX (14 years) vs MCOAX (32 years). MCOAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than CNSFX (0.61). CNSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 114.00 vs. MCOAX (40.00). MCOAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNSFX: MCOAX (15000) vs CNSFX (1000000). MCOAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.37 vs. CNSFX (7.42). MCOAX return over 5 years is better than : 5.63 vs. CNSFX (-7.12).
| CNSFX | MCOAX | CNSFX / MCOAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.93 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.93 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.607 | 17.448 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 15000 | 6,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 25000 | - |
| Net Assets | 906M | 1.84B | 49% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.18 | 1.94 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.42 | 14.37 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.77 | 39.54 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.12 | 5.63 | -126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.00 | 69.87 | 74% |