Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNSFX vs PACIX
CNSFX vs PACIX Comparison
Open Charts CNSFX vs PACIX
CNSFX vs PACIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNSFX vs. PACIX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNSFX is a Hold and PACIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACIX has more cash in the bank: 1.72B vs. CNSFX (906M). CNSFX pays higher dividends than PACIX: CNSFX (2.18) vs PACIX (1.30). CNSFX was incepted earlier than PACIX: CNSFX (14 years) vs PACIX (39 years). PACIX (1.15) is less costly to investors than CNSFX (0.61). PACIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 212.00 vs. CNSFX (114.00). PACIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNSFX: PACIX (2000) vs CNSFX (1000000). PACIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.01 vs. CNSFX (7.42). PACIX return over 5 years is better than : 8.23 vs. CNSFX (-7.12).
| CNSFX | PACIX | CNSFX / PACIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.09 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.15 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.607 | 13.846 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 906M | 1.72B | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.18 | 1.30 | 167% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.42 | 19.01 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.77 | 55.31 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.12 | 8.23 | -87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.00 | 100.96 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers