CNTY
Price
$2.07
Change
+$0.04 (+1.97%)
Updated
Jun 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
95.94M
62 days until earnings call
GMBLP
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.06 (-40.00%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNTY vs GMBLP

Header iconCNTY vs GMBLP Comparison
Open Charts CNTY vs GMBLPBanner chart's image
Century Casinos
Price$2.07
Change+$0.04 (+1.97%)
Volume$9.15K
Capitalization95.94M
Esports Entertainment Group
Price$0.09
Change-$0.06 (-40.00%)
Volume$1.28K
CapitalizationN/A
CNTY vs GMBLP Comparison Chart
Loading...
CNTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNTY vs. GMBLP commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNTY is a Hold and GMBLP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CNTY: $2.05 vs. GMBLP: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: CNTY and GMBLP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNTY: 21% vs. GMBLP: 93%
Market capitalization -- CNTY: $95.94M vs. GMBLP: $0
CNTY [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $95.94M. GMBLP’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNTY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGMBLP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CNTY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GMBLP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GMBLP is a better buy in the long-term than CNTY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNTY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CNTY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CNTY (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а +3.02% price change this week, while GMBLP (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was -40.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -1.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +19.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNTY is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (-1.03% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMBLP YTD gains are higher at: 73.077 vs. CNTY (-36.728). CNTY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 115M vs. GMBLP (-25.74M). CNTY has more cash in the bank: 171M vs. GMBLP (303K). GMBLP has less debt than CNTY: GMBLP (70.4K) vs CNTY (1.02B). CNTY has higher revenues than GMBLP: CNTY (550M) vs GMBLP (16.1M).
CNTYGMBLPCNTY / GMBLP
Capitalization95.9MN/A-
EBITDA115M-25.74M-447%
Gain YTD-36.72873.077-50%
P/E Ratio39.68N/A-
Revenue550M16.1M3,416%
Total Cash171M303K56,436%
Total Debt1.02B70.4K1,450,284%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNTY: Fundamental Ratings
CNTY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
10
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNTY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PPUMX12.81N/A
N/A
Principal LargeCap Growth I R3
FRBRX123.82N/A
N/A
Franklin Biotechnology Discovery R6
SRUIX13.81N/A
N/A
Meeder Spectrum Institutional
LOFLX13.74N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value F3
VLMIX35.04-0.09
-0.26%
Value Line Mid Cap Focused Institutional

CNTY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNTY has been loosely correlated with INSE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNTY jumps, then INSE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNTY
1D Price
Change %
CNTY100%
+0.99%
INSE - CNTY
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.99%
WYNN - CNTY
36%
Loosely correlated
-3.37%
GDEN - CNTY
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.53%
PLYA - CNTY
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BYD - CNTY
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
More

GMBLP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GMBLP and CPHC have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMBLP and CPHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMBLP
1D Price
Change %
GMBLP100%
N/A
CPHC - GMBLP
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNTY - GMBLP
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
CZR - GMBLP
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
VAC - GMBLP
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
LTRY - GMBLP
5%
Poorly correlated
-7.67%
More