It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CNTY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTBTC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CNTY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
CNTY (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а +3.02% price change this week, while TBTC (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was +0.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -2.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.39%.
CNTY is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.
Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.
CNTY | TBTC | CNTY / TBTC | |
Capitalization | 95.9M | 19.5M | 492% |
EBITDA | 115M | 758K | 15,172% |
Gain YTD | -37.346 | 32.031 | -117% |
P/E Ratio | 39.68 | 28.01 | 142% |
Revenue | 550M | 10M | 5,500% |
Total Cash | 171M | 5.28M | 3,237% |
Total Debt | 1.02B | 137K | 745,255% |
CNTY | TBTC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 78 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | 25 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 42 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 41 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 87 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TBTC's Valuation (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNTY (68) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that TBTC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNTY’s over the last 12 months.
TBTC's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNTY (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that TBTC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNTY’s over the last 12 months.
TBTC's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNTY (98) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that TBTC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNTY’s over the last 12 months.
TBTC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as CNTY (57) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that TBTC’s stock grew similarly to CNTY’s over the last 12 months.
CNTY's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is significantly better than the same rating for TBTC (87) in the null industry. This means that CNTY’s stock grew significantly faster than TBTC’s over the last 12 months.
CNTY | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago80% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
ICOP | 28.99 | 0.45 | +1.58% |
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF | |||
DFE | 69.64 | 0.56 | +0.80% |
WisdomTree Europe SmallCap Dividend ETF | |||
TBUX | 49.74 | 0.03 | +0.06% |
T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF | |||
RVT | 14.88 | -0.05 | -0.33% |
Royce Value Trust | |||
AMZD | 11.63 | -0.09 | -0.77% |
Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNTY has been loosely correlated with INSE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNTY jumps, then INSE could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CNTY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CNTY | 100% | +3.57% | ||
INSE - CNTY | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
WYNN - CNTY | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.83% | ||
GDEN - CNTY | 34% Loosely correlated | -4.23% | ||
PLYA - CNTY | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.22% | ||
BYD - CNTY | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.27% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that TBTC and CNTY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TBTC and CNTY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TBTC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TBTC | 100% | -1.48% | ||
CNTY - TBTC | 20% Poorly correlated | +3.57% | ||
BTSBF - TBTC | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
SJMHY - TBTC | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
WYNMF - TBTC | 11% Poorly correlated | +4.13% | ||
SCHYF - TBTC | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |