Advertisement
CNX vs EQT
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CNX Resources Corporation (CNX) vs. EQT Corporation (EQT) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both CNX and EQT are premier natural gas producers focused on the Appalachian Basin, benefiting from rising demand in power generation and LNG exports.
- CNX offers a lower price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of about 9.5 versus EQT's 17.2, highlighting potential value in recent market activity.
- EQT has a much larger market capitalization of $35.6 billion compared to CNX's $5.4 billion, providing greater scale and stability.
- Year-to-date (YTD), EQT shows stronger returns at 6.6% versus CNX's 3.2%, though CNX led over the past year with 23% gains against 13%.
- Analyst price targets indicate potential upside for EQT (average $68.65) while CNX sits near its average of $37.46.
Introduction
CNX Resources Corporation and EQT Corporation are key players in the U.S. natural gas sector, both concentrating operations in the prolific Appalachian Basin. This comparison is relevant for energy sector investors and traders assessing relative performance amid fluctuating commodity prices, evolving demand from data centers and LNG exports, and broader market positioning. By examining business models, recent momentum, and key metrics, readers can gauge which stock aligns better with current market dynamics in stock comparison analysis.
CNX Overview and Recent Performance
CNX Resources Corporation is an independent natural gas company engaged in exploration, production, and midstream activities, primarily in the Marcellus Shale of the Appalachian Basin. The company emphasizes ultra-low carbon intensive operations and technology-driven development. In recent market activity, CNX stock has traded around $38, experiencing some pullback amid mixed quarterly results, including earnings per share (EPS) beats but revenue shortfalls. Sentiment has been influenced by debt tender offers, senior notes issuance, and sensitivity to natural gas pricing dynamics. Broader performance shows solid profitability with a 30% net profit margin and strong free cash flow generation, supporting shareholder returns in a volatile energy environment.
EQT Overview and Recent Performance
EQT Corporation is a vertically integrated natural gas producer with focus on the Appalachian Basin's Marcellus and Utica shales, handling exploration, production, gathering, and transmission. As the largest U.S. natural gas producer by volume, it benefits from economies of scale. Recently, EQT shares hovered near $57, with modest declines amid anticipation for quarterly earnings and dividend declarations. Key drivers include rising power sector demand, AI-related growth prospects, and Appalachian pricing strength from LNG and data center needs. The stock reflects resilience with a 25% profit margin, lower debt levels, and positive analyst sentiment in recent weeks.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots—over 350 in total—that analyze thousands of tickers using diverse strategies like swing trading, trend following, and multi-agent systems across various timeframes from minutes to months. The Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 performers best suited to current market conditions, showcasing impressive stats such as annualized returns ranging from 15% to 168%, win rates of 54% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.7. For instance, leading bots deliver over 100% annualized gains with drawdowns managed effectively. These bots employ technical and fundamental analyses for stocks, ETFs, and sectors, adapting dynamically. Traders can explore these high-performing options to enhance strategies amid volatile energy markets.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both CNX and EQT share similar business models centered on low-cost Appalachian natural gas production, exposing them to commodity price swings and regional basis risks. However, EQT's larger scale drives superior production volumes and midstream integration, contrasting CNX's agile, technology-focused approach with higher return on equity (ROE, a measure of profitability relative to shareholders' equity). Growth drivers include shared catalysts like AI data center power demand and LNG exports bolstering basin pricing. Recent momentum favors CNX on a one-year basis but EQT year-to-date. Risk factors involve natural gas volatility, with EQT showing lower debt-to-equity (a leverage metric) for stability, while CNX trades at a valuation discount. Market sentiment leans toward EQT for its size amid energy transition themes.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward EQT based on its scale advantages, alignment with rising natural gas demand from power and LNG sectors, consistent analyst upside potential, and relative stability in recent trends. While CNX offers compelling value metrics, EQT's positioning suggests higher probability of outperformance in the near term.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNX is a Hold and EQT is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CNX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEQT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CNX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- EQT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CNX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EQT’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CNX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- EQT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CNX (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +1.74% price change this week, while EQT (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -0.94% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -5.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -14.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.25%.
Reported Earning Dates
CNX is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
EQT is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Production (-5.63% weekly)The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.
| CNX | EQT | CNX / EQT | |
| Capitalization | 4.62B | 31.7B | 15% |
| EBITDA | 2.26B | 7.62B | 30% |
| Gain YTD | -11.150 | -4.839 | 230% |
| P/E Ratio | 4.36 | 9.62 | 45% |
| Revenue | 2.32B | 9.55B | 24% |
| Total Cash | 3.75M | 327M | 1% |
| Total Debt | 2.54B | 5.99B | 42% |
CNX | EQT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 53 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 58 Fair valued | 74 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 36 | 33 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 35 | 60 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CNX's Valuation (58) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as EQT (74) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that CNX’s stock grew similarly to EQT’s over the last 12 months.
EQT's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as CNX (36) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that EQT’s stock grew similarly to CNX’s over the last 12 months.
CNX's SMR Rating (35) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as EQT (60) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that CNX’s stock grew similarly to EQT’s over the last 12 months.
EQT's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as CNX (75) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that EQT’s stock grew similarly to CNX’s over the last 12 months.
CNX's P/E Growth Rating (99) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as EQT (100) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that CNX’s stock grew similarly to EQT’s over the last 12 months.
| CNX | EQT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 77% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 70% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EWT | 109.99 | 4.88 | +4.64% |
| iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | |||
| HNDL | 22.74 | 0.18 | +0.80% |
| Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7 Handl™ ETF | |||
| RJDI | 28.76 | 0.22 | +0.77% |
| RJ Eagle GCM Dividend Select Income ETF | |||
| DECT | 39.24 | 0.29 | +0.74% |
| AllianzIM US Equity Buffer10 Dec ETF | |||
| FPXE | 36.42 | 0.24 | +0.65% |
| First Trust IPOX Europe Equity Opps ETF | |||
CNX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNX has been closely correlated with RRC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNX jumps, then RRC could also see price increases.
EQT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQT has been closely correlated with EXE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EQT jumps, then EXE could also see price increases.