Advertisement
EQT vs GPOR
Which Stock Would AI Choose? EQT Corporation (EQT) vs. Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- EQT and GPOR are both natural gas-focused producers, with EQT leading as the largest U.S. natural gas producer by market capitalization at over $35 billion.
- Recent year-to-date (YTD) returns are closely matched, with GPOR at approximately 7% and EQT at 6.6%, amid soft natural gas prices.
- EQT trades at a higher price-to-earnings (PE) ratio of 17.2 compared to GPOR's 9.0, reflecting differences in scale and growth expectations.
- Analyst price targets suggest upside potential for both, around 20% for EQT and 26% for GPOR, driven by anticipated demand growth.
- Both face risks from natural gas price volatility but benefit from regional production strengths in Appalachia and Oklahoma/Ohio basins.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines EQT Corporation and Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR), two key players in the natural gas exploration and production sector. Amid fluctuating energy markets and rising demand forecasts for natural gas, investors and traders seek insights into relative performance, valuation, and momentum. This analysis highlights recent market activity, business drivers, and head-to-head metrics to aid decisions on positioning in upstream energy stocks. Professionals tracking commodity-linked equities and those diversifying in oil and gas may find value in understanding how these peers stack up in the current environment.
EQT Overview and Recent Performance
EQT Corporation is a leading natural gas producer focused on the Appalachian Basin, engaging in exploration, production, and midstream activities. The company sells natural gas, natural gas liquids (NGLs), and oil to utilities and industrials, while managing pipeline capacity and hedging risks. In recent market activity, EQT's shares have traded around $57, within a 52-week range of $47 to $68, reflecting resilience despite subdued natural gas prices below $3 per million British thermal units (MMBtu). Year-to-date gains stand at 6.6%, with one-year returns at 13.1%. Sentiment has been supported by quarterly dividend declarations, preparations for Q1 earnings with projected revenue growth over 47% year-over-year, and optimism around free cash flow from in-basin demand like power generation projects. Soft commodity prices have tempered gains, but analysts maintain targets around $69.
GPOR Overview and Recent Performance
Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) is an independent explorer and producer of natural gas, crude oil, and NGLs, with core assets in the Utica and Marcellus shales in Ohio and SCOOP formations in Oklahoma. Headquartered in Oklahoma City, it emphasizes efficient operations in these basins. Shares recently hovered near $193, in a 52-week range of $161 to $226, buoyed by YTD returns of 7% and one-year gains of 12%. Recent weeks have seen analyst adjustments, including UBS's Buy rating with a $245 target amid leadership transitions and 2025 adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) of $878 million on 29% liquids growth. Low natural gas prices have pressured margins, but resilient operations and price target hikes signal positive sentiment shifts tied to commodity recovery expectations.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI-powered trading bots curated from over 350 available models that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like swing trading, trend following, and scalping on timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 days, with impressive stats including annualized returns ranging from +15% to +168%, win rates of 54% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.7. Energy sector bots, for instance, target oil, semiconductors, and precious metals with returns like +81% annualized. Selected for current market suitability, they incorporate AI/ML for risk management and pattern recognition. Traders can explore subscription-based copy trading to leverage these high-performers tailored to volatile conditions.
Head-to-Head Comparison
EQT and GPOR share upstream natural gas exposure but differ in scale and geography: EQT dominates Appalachia with integrated midstream for efficiency, while GPOR diversifies across Ohio and Oklahoma plays, emphasizing liquids growth. Recent momentum is comparable YTD, though EQT's larger $35 billion market cap offers stability versus GPOR's $3.6 billion cap and higher volatility. Valuation contrasts show GPOR's lower PE suggesting value, balanced by EQT's cash flow strength. Both grapple with natural gas price risks but gain from demand catalysts; EQT edges in sector leadership, while GPOR provides growth trade-offs in multi-basin ops.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models currently lean toward EQT with moderate conviction, citing its superior scale, consistent trend stability, and near-term catalysts like earnings and demand contracts. GPOR shows promise in valuation and liquids upside but trails in relative positioning amid market volatility. This probabilistic edge favors EQT for trend-following strategies in the current natural gas environment.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQT is a Hold and GPOR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EQT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGPOR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- EQT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- GPOR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EQT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GPOR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EQT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
- GPOR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
EQT (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -0.94% price change this week, while GPOR (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -1.09% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -5.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -14.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.25%.
Reported Earning Dates
EQT is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
GPOR is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Production (-5.63% weekly)The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.
| EQT | GPOR | EQT / GPOR | |
| Capitalization | 31.7B | 2.89B | 1,098% |
| EBITDA | 7.62B | 1.12B | 681% |
| Gain YTD | -4.839 | -22.732 | 21% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.62 | 5.28 | 182% |
| Revenue | 9.55B | 1.43B | 667% |
| Total Cash | 327M | 2.92M | 11,195% |
| Total Debt | 5.99B | 824M | 727% |
EQT | GPOR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | 60 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 33 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 60 | 31 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 78 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 91 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 78 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GPOR's Valuation (60) in the null industry is in the same range as EQT (74) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that GPOR’s stock grew similarly to EQT’s over the last 12 months.
GPOR's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the null industry is in the same range as EQT (33) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that GPOR’s stock grew similarly to EQT’s over the last 12 months.
GPOR's SMR Rating (31) in the null industry is in the same range as EQT (60) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that GPOR’s stock grew similarly to EQT’s over the last 12 months.
EQT's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as GPOR (78) in the null industry. This means that EQT’s stock grew similarly to GPOR’s over the last 12 months.
GPOR's P/E Growth Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as EQT (100) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that GPOR’s stock grew similarly to EQT’s over the last 12 months.
| EQT | GPOR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 18 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 65% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ITB | 99.25 | 3.46 | +3.61% |
| iShares US Home Construction ETF | |||
| TSLG | 6.48 | 0.13 | +2.05% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF | |||
| MTGP | 44.17 | 0.11 | +0.25% |
| WisdomTree Mortgage Plus Bond | |||
| CBTL | 17.61 | -0.06 | -0.31% |
| Calamos Ladrd Bitcoin 80 Str Alt Prt ETF | |||
| IAK | 134.39 | -0.65 | -0.48% |
| iShares US Insurance ETF | |||
EQT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQT has been closely correlated with EXE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EQT jumps, then EXE could also see price increases.
GPOR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPOR has been closely correlated with RRC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GPOR jumps, then RRC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GPOR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPOR | 100% | -0.57% | ||
| RRC - GPOR | 78% Closely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| EXE - GPOR | 75% Closely correlated | -0.55% | ||
| AR - GPOR | 74% Closely correlated | -2.01% | ||
| EQT - GPOR | 72% Closely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| CRK - GPOR | 70% Closely correlated | -0.23% | ||
More | ||||