Investors scanning the technology solutions and distribution landscape frequently encounter two names that operate in adjacent lanes: CNXN (PC Connection, Inc.) and SCSC (ScanSource, Inc.). While both companies facilitate the flow of information technology products and services to businesses, their approaches, financial profiles, and risk characteristics differ in ways that matter to portfolio construction. This stock comparison examines how these two firms have performed in recent market activity, what is driving sentiment around each name, and how an AI-powered analytical framework might assess their relative positioning. Whether you are a growth-oriented trader or a value-conscious investor seeking stability, understanding the contrasts between CNXN and SCSC can sharpen your sector perspective.
CNXN, headquartered in Merrimack, New Hampshire, is a leading information technology solutions provider serving business, government, healthcare, and education markets across the United States. The company operates through three segments: Business Solutions, Enterprise Solutions, and Public Sector Solutions. Its model revolves around providing integrated IT hardware, software, and services directly to end customers, with a particular emphasis on data center modernization, digital workplace transformation, and supply chain innovation.
In recent months, CNXN has demonstrated notable stock price momentum. After closing 2025 at $57.41, the shares have rallied substantially, recently trading near $83 and touching a 52-week high. The company reported full-year 2025 net sales of approximately $2.9 billion, a 2.5% increase year-over-year, with gross profit rising 3.8% to $539.3 million. Gross margin expanded 20 basis points to 18.8%, while the company generated diluted EPS (earnings per share) of $3.27. CNXN also boosted its quarterly dividend to $0.20 per share and authorized an additional $50 million for its share repurchase program, signaling management confidence in the balance sheet. With a beta of 0.85 and a market capitalization near $2.1 billion, CNXN has attracted investors seeking measured technology exposure with a capital-return component.
SCSC, based in Greenville, South Carolina, is a hybrid technology distributor uniquely positioned at the intersection of converging technologies. The company operates through two segments: Specialty Technology Solutions, which distributes mobility, barcode, point-of-sale, networking, and physical security products; and Intelisys & Advisory, which focuses on connectivity, cloud, and recurring revenue services sold through channel sales partners. Unlike CNXN, SCSC does not sell directly to end users but instead empowers a network of value-added resellers.
SCSC's stock has also enjoyed a robust recovery in recent market activity. After ending calendar 2025 near $39, shares have surged to approximately $57, reflecting a year-to-date gain of roughly 47%. For its fiscal year 2025 (ended June 30, 2025), SCSC reported net sales of $3.04 billion, down 6.7% year-over-year, though gross profit grew 2.4% to $408.6 million — aided by a mix shift toward higher-margin recurring revenue. The company's non-GAAP (a measure that adjusts for certain one-time items) diluted EPS reached $3.57 for the fiscal year. SCSC has been actively repurchasing shares, including a $200 million authorization announced in May 2025, and carries no dividend. With a beta of 1.28 and a market capitalization of roughly $1.17 billion, SCSC appeals to investors willing to accept greater volatility for exposure to an evolving distribution-to-services transformation story.
For traders seeking a data-driven edge, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of the platform's most promising AI-powered trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of these automated agents, each trading thousands of different tickers across equities, ETFs, and other instruments — yet only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn a spot in the Trending section. The bots span a wide spectrum of trading styles, from short-term 5-minute and 15-minute models to longer-duration 60-minute strategies, with annualized returns that have ranged from approximately 30% to above 230% across various sectors. Win rates among featured bots have reached as high as 67.5%, and profit factors have topped 4.5 in some configurations. Every bot operates with its own unique strategy, risk parameters, time horizon, and ticker universe, allowing users to select approaches that match their individual preferences. To explore which AI trading bots are currently leading the platform, visit the Trending AI Robots page.
While both CNXN and SCSC sit within the broader technology solutions ecosystem, their business models create distinct investment profiles. CNXN functions as a direct IT solutions provider, which supports structurally higher gross margins — typically 18% to 20% — because the company captures value across the entire customer relationship. SCSC, as a distributor, operates on thinner gross margins of 13% to 15%, a natural feature of the wholesale distribution model. However, SCSC is actively shifting its revenue mix: recurring revenue now accounts for approximately 32% of gross profit, up from roughly 28% a year ago, driven by the Intelisys & Advisory segment. This evolution could narrow the margin gap over time.
On growth dynamics, the two companies are navigating different currents. CNXN has benefited from sustained enterprise investment in data center refreshes and the Windows 11 upgrade cycle, though its Public Sector Solutions segment has faced headwinds from shifting government procurement patterns. SCSC, meanwhile, saw overall net sales contract in fiscal 2025 due to a cautious technology spending environment, but displayed a sharp recovery in its most recent quarters — its Q4 FY25 net sales grew 8.9% year-over-year, and non-GAAP diluted EPS climbed 27.5%.
Risk profiles also diverge. CNXN's lower beta of 0.85 and its dividend policy make it a relatively defensive name within the technology sector. SCSC's higher beta of 1.28 reflects its greater sensitivity to economic cycles — technology distribution volumes can swing materially with corporate capital expenditure budgets. On valuation, CNXN trades at a forward P/E (price-to-earnings ratio) in the low-20s, while SCSC trades at a discount in the mid-teens, partly reflecting its thinner margins and higher leverage to discretionary IT spending.
Weighing the observable evidence, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely find both stocks investable but for different reasons — and within different strategy contexts. CNXN presents a more stable trend profile, supported by consistent gross margin expansion, a shareholder-friendly capital allocation policy, and lower volatility. For trend-following AI bots that prioritize consistency and risk-adjusted returns, CNXN's steadier uptrend and defensive characteristics may carry greater appeal. SCSC, on the other hand, offers stronger momentum signals and a compelling transformation narrative centered on recurring revenue growth and margin improvement. Its higher beta and recent price acceleration could make it more attractive to momentum-oriented AI strategies, though the elevated volatility introduces a wider range of potential outcomes. In a side-by-side evaluation favoring trend consistency and stability — traits often prioritized by longer-duration AI models — the framework would lean toward CNXN, while acknowledging that SCSC's transformation trajectory and recent earning power merit close attention. Neither assessment constitutes a prediction, and both stocks carry risks that any AI or human investor must carefully weigh.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CNXN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSCSC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CNXN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCSC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CNXN (@Electronics/Appliance Stores) experienced а +3.07% price change this week, while SCSC (@Electronics/Appliance Stores) price change was +3.17% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliance Stores industry was +3.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.95%.
CNXN is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
SCSC is expected to report earnings on Aug 25, 2026.
The electronics/appliance stores industry includes companies that sell consumer electronics such as computers, stereo components, software, TVs, and appliances such as those for cooking and cleaning. Some companies also operate stores that rent and sell pre-recorded CDs and DVDs. Best Buy Co., Inc., Conn’s, Inc., Sears Hometown and Outlet Stores Inc. and Trans World Entertainment Corp. are some of the largest companies in this space.
| CNXN | SCSC | CNXN / SCSC | |
| Capitalization | 2.11B | 1.15B | 184% |
| EBITDA | 141M | 130M | 108% |
| Gain YTD | 45.839 | 44.956 | 102% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.15 | 17.21 | 129% |
| Revenue | 2.99B | 3.09B | 97% |
| Total Cash | 341M | 120M | 284% |
| Total Debt | 6.68M | 102M | 7% |
CNXN | SCSC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | 67 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 40 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 71 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 32 | 28 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SCSC's Valuation (67) in the Electronics Distributors industry is in the same range as CNXN (86) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that SCSC’s stock grew similarly to CNXN’s over the last 12 months.
CNXN's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as SCSC (40) in the Electronics Distributors industry. This means that CNXN’s stock grew similarly to SCSC’s over the last 12 months.
CNXN's SMR Rating (71) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as SCSC (79) in the Electronics Distributors industry. This means that CNXN’s stock grew similarly to SCSC’s over the last 12 months.
CNXN's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as SCSC (38) in the Electronics Distributors industry. This means that CNXN’s stock grew similarly to SCSC’s over the last 12 months.
SCSC's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Electronics Distributors industry is in the same range as CNXN (32) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that SCSC’s stock grew similarly to CNXN’s over the last 12 months.
| CNXN | SCSC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 47% | 4 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 66% | 6 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 59% | 12 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 53% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 66% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FDIS | 101.52 | 2.60 | +2.63% |
| Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discret ETF | |||
| DCMT | 33.33 | 0.07 | +0.20% |
| DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF | |||
| ISCB | 74.32 | -0.14 | -0.18% |
| iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | |||
| RTRE | 24.50 | -0.06 | -0.26% |
| Rareview Total Return Bond ETF | |||
| RJMI | 25.02 | -0.06 | -0.26% |
| RJ Eagle Municipal Income ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNXN has been loosely correlated with AVT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNXN jumps, then AVT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CNXN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNXN | 100% | +1.49% | ||
| AVT - CNXN | 54% Loosely correlated | +2.35% | ||
| NSIT - CNXN | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| SCSC - CNXN | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| ARW - CNXN | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.75% | ||
| CLMB - CNXN | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.26% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCSC has been loosely correlated with AVT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCSC jumps, then AVT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCSC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCSC | 100% | +0.25% | ||
| AVT - SCSC | 50% Loosely correlated | +2.35% | ||
| NSIT - SCSC | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| SNX - SCSC | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.42% | ||
| CNXN - SCSC | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.49% | ||
| CLMB - SCSC | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.26% | ||
More | ||||