AVT
Price
$88.84
Change
+$2.04 (+2.35%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
7.29B
2 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CNXN
Price
$83.72
Change
+$1.23 (+1.49%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
2.11B
93 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AVT vs CNXN

AVT vs CNXN Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 30, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Avnet (AVT) vs. PC Connection (CNXN) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Avnet (AVT) is a global electronics components distributor with approximately $22 billion in annual revenue, while PC Connection (CNXN) is a U.S.-focused IT solutions provider with roughly $2.9 billion in annual sales.
  • Both stocks have delivered strong share price gains over the past year: AVT has risen more than 50% over the trailing 12 months, while CNXN has added approximately 20% in the same period.
  • Avnet operates on razor-thin operating margins of 2–3%, typical of high-volume electronics distribution, whereas PC Connection generates gross margins near 19–20%, reflecting its value-added solutions model.
  • Both companies are returning capital to shareholders through dividends and aggressive share repurchases; Avnet has grown its dividend for 12 consecutive years, and PC Connection recently raised its quarterly payout.
  • CNXN carries a significantly lower trailing P/E ratio (price-to-earnings) of roughly 24 compared to AVT's approximately 33, indicating different market valuation expectations.
  • Divergent risk profiles exist: AVT faces global semiconductor cycle and tariff uncertainty, while CNXN contends with public sector spending volatility and hardware commoditization.

Introduction

Investors scouring the technology supply chain for opportunities often encounter two distinctly positioned companies: AVT (Avnet, Inc.) and CNXN (PC Connection, Inc.). Avnet is a global behemoth in electronic components distribution, connecting thousands of suppliers to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) worldwide. PC Connection, by contrast, is a focused IT solutions provider serving business, government, healthcare, and education customers across the United States. This comparison examines how two companies operating at opposite ends of the technology supply chain — one a massive distributor, the other a solutions-oriented reseller — stack up in terms of recent performance, market positioning, and what an AI-driven analytical framework might discern about their relative attractiveness in the current market environment.

AVT Overview and Recent Performance

Avnet, Inc. (AVT), headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona, is one of the world's largest distributors of electronic components and enterprise computing products. The company operates through two primary segments: Electronic Components (EC), which distributes semiconductors and interconnect, passive, and electromechanical devices, and Farnell, which supplies electronic components and industrial automation products primarily to engineers and smaller buyers. With annual revenue exceeding $22 billion in its most recent fiscal year, Avnet's scale is difficult to replicate.

In recent months, Avnet has exhibited notable momentum. The company reported fiscal first-quarter 2026 sales of $5.9 billion, beating consensus estimates by roughly 3.5% and growing 5.3% year-over-year. Asia has been a particular bright spot, delivering five consecutive quarters of year-over-year sales growth, while Farnell returned to double-digit expansion. However, adjusted diluted EPS (earnings per share) declined 8.7% year-over-year to $0.84, and second-quarter guidance fell short of analyst expectations, triggering some short-term share price pressure. Over the past year, AVT shares have nonetheless risen substantially from their 52-week lows near $44 to trade above $83, supported by aggressive capital return initiatives — the company repurchased approximately 8% of its outstanding shares over four quarters and recently increased its quarterly dividend by 6%. The stock currently offers a dividend yield near 1.6%.

CNXN Overview and Recent Performance

PC Connection, Inc. (CNXN), doing business as Connection, is headquartered in Merrimack, New Hampshire, and operates as a Fortune 1000 IT solutions provider. The company serves customers through three segments: Business Solutions (focused on small and medium-sized businesses), Enterprise Solutions (serving large corporate clients), and Public Sector Solutions (catering to federal, state, and local government as well as education). Connection offers over 460,000 products from more than 2,500 vendors and has earned over 5,000 technical certifications.

Connection's recent financial performance tells a story of margin expansion despite uneven top-line growth. For the full year 2025, net sales rose 2.5% to $2.9 billion, while gross margin expanded 20 basis points to 18.8%. More strikingly, the fourth quarter of 2025 saw gross margin reach 19.3%, up 100 basis points year-over-year, and adjusted diluted EPS climbed to $0.91 from $0.78 in the prior-year period. The Enterprise Solutions segment delivered 11.9% revenue growth in Q4, and software sales jumped 24%, reflecting the broader IT modernization trend. However, Public Sector Solutions revenue contracted sharply — down 36.8% in Q4 — as government procurement cycles softened. Connection's balance sheet remains a standout: the company held over $406 million in cash and short-term investments at year-end 2025 against negligible debt, and its board recently expanded the share buyback authorization by $50 million. The quarterly dividend was also raised to $0.20 per share, yielding approximately 0.96%.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking a data-driven edge in navigating comparisons like this one, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to adapt to evolving market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market dynamics earn a place in this featured section. These bots span a wide range of trading styles — from short-term momentum strategies to longer-duration swing and trend-following approaches — with some showcasing annualized performance figures that have significantly outpaced benchmarks during favorable regimes, while others emphasize risk-adjusted consistency. Each bot has a distinct statistical profile, including metrics such as win rate, Sharpe ratio, and maximum drawdown, allowing users to evaluate which strategy best matches their risk tolerance. To explore which AI trading bots are currently trending and what signals they are generating, visit the Trending AI Robots page today.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The differences between AVT and CNXN begin with their business models. Avnet is a high-volume, low-margin distributor operating on an operating margin of roughly 2–3%. Its profitability depends on inventory management, working capital efficiency, and navigating the notoriously cyclical semiconductor industry. PC Connection, by contrast, is a solutions provider with gross margins approaching 20% — significantly higher than the distribution average — driven by value-added services such as configuration, supply chain management, and technical consulting. This gives CNXN a structurally more profitable model, albeit at a much smaller revenue scale.

Growth drivers also diverge. Avnet is benefiting from a cyclical recovery in electronic components, particularly in Asia, and the turnaround of its Farnell segment. PC Connection, meanwhile, is riding secular trends in data center modernization, Windows 11 migration, and AI-driven IT infrastructure investment. Software sales growth of 24% at Connection signals a favorable product mix shift that could further support margins. On the risk side, Avnet is exposed to global trade policy uncertainty — including tariff risks — and the inherent volatility of semiconductor demand cycles. Connection faces concentration risk in U.S. public sector spending and the ongoing commoditization of hardware resale, which pressures pricing power.

From a valuation standpoint, the contrast is stark. AVT trades at a trailing P/E multiple of approximately 33, reflecting the market's anticipation of an earnings recovery as the semiconductor cycle turns. CNXN trades at a more modest trailing P/E of around 24, and some valuation analyses suggest the stock may be undervalued relative to its fair value estimate. Balance sheet strength favors Connection, which carries virtually no long-term debt and substantial net cash, while Avnet operates with approximately $2.79 billion in long-term debt — a meaningful but manageable figure given its cash flow generation capacity.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors evaluated through an AI-driven analytical lens, CNXN would likely emerge as the more probabilistically favorable candidate in the current environment — though with important caveats. Connection's expanding gross margins, strong balance sheet with substantial net cash, consistent profitability even during periods of uneven revenue growth, and exposure to structural IT modernization trends provide a foundation that an AI model might assess as more stable and compounding in nature. Avnet's narrative is more cyclical: the company has significant operating leverage to a semiconductor recovery, an aggressive buyback program, and improving geographic momentum, but its thinner margins and higher debt load introduce greater variability in outcomes. An AI system weighting trend consistency, downside protection, and margin quality would likely tilt toward Connection, while acknowledging that Avnet offers greater potential torque — and risk — if the electronics cycle accelerates faster than anticipated. Neither stock is without challenges, and the final assessment depends heavily on which factors an investor prioritizes in their decision framework.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
AVT vs. CNXN commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AVT is a StrongBuy and CNXN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (AVT: $88.84 vs. CNXN: $83.72)
Brand notoriety: AVT and CNXN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronics/Appliance Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AVT: 55% vs. CNXN: 110%
Market capitalization -- AVT: $7.29B vs. CNXN: $2.11B
AVT [@Electronics/Appliance Stores] is valued at $7.29B. CNXN’s [@Electronics/Appliance Stores] market capitalization is $2.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronics/Appliance Stores] industry ranges from $20.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronics/Appliance Stores] industry is $5.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AVT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCNXN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AVT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CNXN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AVT and CNXN are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AVT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CNXN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AVT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CNXN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AVT is a better buy in the short-term than CNXN.

Price Growth

AVT (@Electronics/Appliance Stores) experienced а -0.65% price change this week, while CNXN (@Electronics/Appliance Stores) price change was +3.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliance Stores industry was +3.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

AVT is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

CNXN is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronics/Appliance Stores (+3.93% weekly)

The electronics/appliance stores industry includes companies that sell consumer electronics such as computers, stereo components, software, TVs, and appliances such as those for cooking and cleaning. Some companies also operate stores that rent and sell pre-recorded CDs and DVDs. Best Buy Co., Inc., Conn’s, Inc., Sears Hometown and Outlet Stores Inc. and Trans World Entertainment Corp. are some of the largest companies in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AVT($7.29B) has a higher market cap than CNXN($2.11B). AVT has higher P/E ratio than CNXN: AVT (34.30) vs CNXN (22.15). AVT YTD gains are higher at: 86.497 vs. CNXN (45.839). AVT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 687M vs. CNXN (141M). CNXN has more cash in the bank: 341M vs. AVT (202M). CNXN has less debt than AVT: CNXN (6.68M) vs AVT (3.17B). AVT has higher revenues than CNXN: AVT (25B) vs CNXN (2.99B).
AVTCNXNAVT / CNXN
Capitalization7.29B2.11B345%
EBITDA687M141M487%
Gain YTD86.49745.839189%
P/E Ratio34.3022.15155%
Revenue25B2.99B837%
Total Cash202M341M59%
Total Debt3.17B6.68M47,506%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AVT vs CNXN: Fundamental Ratings
AVT
CNXN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
621
SMR RATING
1..100
8771
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3937
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
732
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AVT's Valuation (83) in the Electronics Distributors industry is in the same range as CNXN (86) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that AVT’s stock grew similarly to CNXN’s over the last 12 months.

AVT's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Electronics Distributors industry is in the same range as CNXN (21) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that AVT’s stock grew similarly to CNXN’s over the last 12 months.

CNXN's SMR Rating (71) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as AVT (87) in the Electronics Distributors industry. This means that CNXN’s stock grew similarly to AVT’s over the last 12 months.

CNXN's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as AVT (39) in the Electronics Distributors industry. This means that CNXN’s stock grew similarly to AVT’s over the last 12 months.

AVT's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Electronics Distributors industry is in the same range as CNXN (32) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that AVT’s stock grew similarly to CNXN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AVTCNXN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AVT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CNXN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FDIS101.522.60
+2.63%
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discret ETF
DCMT33.330.07
+0.20%
DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF
ISCB74.32-0.14
-0.18%
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF
RTRE24.50-0.06
-0.26%
Rareview Total Return Bond ETF
RJMI25.02-0.06
-0.26%
RJ Eagle Municipal Income ETF

AVT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AVT has been closely correlated with ARW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AVT jumps, then ARW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AVT
1D Price
Change %
AVT100%
+2.35%
ARW - AVT
83%
Closely correlated
+1.75%
SNX - AVT
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.42%
CNXN - AVT
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.49%
SCSC - AVT
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
NSIT - AVT
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.91%
More

CNXN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNXN has been loosely correlated with AVT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNXN jumps, then AVT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNXN
1D Price
Change %
CNXN100%
+1.49%
AVT - CNXN
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.35%
NSIT - CNXN
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.91%
SCSC - CNXN
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
ARW - CNXN
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.75%
CLMB - CNXN
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
More