Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNZLX vs FCCNX
CNZLX vs FCCNX Comparison
Open Charts CNZLX vs FCCNX
CNZLX vs FCCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNZLX vs. FCCNX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNZLX is a StrongBuy and FCCNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCCNX has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. CNZLX (13.4M). CNZLX pays higher dividends than FCCNX: CNZLX (0.51) vs FCCNX (0.00). CNZLX was incepted earlier than FCCNX: CNZLX (35 years) vs FCCNX (19 years). CNZLX (2.89) is less costly to investors than FCCNX (1.89). FCCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. CNZLX (8.00). FCCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNZLX: FCCNX (0) vs CNZLX (200). FCCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.56 vs. CNZLX (8.41). FCCNX return over 5 years is better than : 32.87 vs. CNZLX (-17.11).
| CNZLX | FCCNX | CNZLX / FCCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.89 | 1.89 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.89 | 1.89 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.859 | 6.755 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 200 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.4M | 1.11B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.41 | 9.56 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.52 | 32.73 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.11 | 32.87 | -52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.90 | 76.27 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement