Ad is loading...
CNZLX vs FCNSX
CNZLX vs FCNSX Comparison
Open Charts CNZLX vs FCNSX
Commonwealth Australia/New Zealand
Price$9.70
Change+$0.20 (+2.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.16M
Fidelity Series Canada
Price$15.23
Change-$0.34 (-2.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.41B
CNZLX vs FCNSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNZLX vs. FCNSX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNZLX is a Buy and FCNSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCNSX has more cash in the bank: 5.41B vs. CNZLX (10.2M). FCNSX pays higher dividends than CNZLX: FCNSX (2.59) vs CNZLX (1.13). CNZLX was incepted earlier than FCNSX: CNZLX (33 years) vs FCNSX (8 years). CNZLX (2.86) is less costly to investors than FCNSX (0.00). FCNSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. CNZLX (8.00). FCNSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNZLX: FCNSX (0) vs CNZLX (200). FCNSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.21 vs. CNZLX (-11.07). FCNSX return over 5 years is better than : 90.81 vs. CNZLX (-0.50).
| CNZLX | FCNSX | CNZLX / FCNSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.86 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.86 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.566 | -6.633 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 200 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.2M | 5.41B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 2.59 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.07 | -3.21 | 345% |
| Returns for 3 years | -33.86 | 2.99 | -1,132% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.50 | 90.81 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | -9.66 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers