Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNZLX vs FCNSX
CNZLX vs FCNSX Comparison
Open Charts CNZLX vs FCNSX
CNZLX vs FCNSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNZLX vs. FCNSX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNZLX is a Hold and FCNSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCNSX has more cash in the bank: 10.2B vs. CNZLX (13.5M). FCNSX pays higher dividends than CNZLX: FCNSX (1.18) vs CNZLX (0.50). CNZLX was incepted earlier than FCNSX: CNZLX (35 years) vs FCNSX (9 years). CNZLX (2.89) is less costly to investors than FCNSX (0.00). FCNSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. CNZLX (8.00). FCNSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNZLX: FCNSX (0) vs CNZLX (200). FCNSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.63 vs. CNZLX (9.37). FCNSX return over 5 years is better than : 75.48 vs. CNZLX (-14.88).
| CNZLX | FCNSX | CNZLX / FCNSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.89 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.89 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.305 | 10.937 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 200 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.5M | 10.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.18 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.37 | 21.63 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.37 | 61.35 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.88 | 75.48 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.04 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers