Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNZLX vs FCNSX
CNZLX vs FCNSX Comparison
Open Charts CNZLX vs FCNSX
CNZLX vs FCNSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNZLX vs. FCNSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNZLX is a Hold and FCNSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCNSX has more cash in the bank: 10.2B vs. CNZLX (13.4M). FCNSX pays higher dividends than CNZLX: FCNSX (1.21) vs CNZLX (0.49). CNZLX was incepted earlier than FCNSX: CNZLX (35 years) vs FCNSX (9 years). CNZLX (2.89) is less costly to investors than FCNSX (0.00). FCNSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. CNZLX (8.00). FCNSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNZLX: FCNSX (0) vs CNZLX (200). FCNSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.06 vs. CNZLX (12.86). FCNSX return over 5 years is better than : 66.95 vs. CNZLX (-18.26).
| CNZLX | FCNSX | CNZLX / FCNSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.89 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.89 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.698 | 5.772 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 200 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.4M | 10.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 1.21 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.86 | 17.06 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.90 | 61.42 | 23% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.26 | 66.95 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.74 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers