CODQL
Price
$0.10
Change
+$0.01 (+11.11%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
2.06B
METCB
Price
$8.29
Change
+$0.38 (+4.81%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
856.16M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CODQL vs METCB

Header iconCODQL vs METCB Comparison
Open Charts CODQL vs METCBBanner chart's image
Coronado Global Res
Price$0.10
Change+$0.01 (+11.11%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization2.06B
Ramaco Resources
Price$8.29
Change+$0.38 (+4.81%)
Volume$84.86K
Capitalization856.16M
CODQL vs METCB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CODQL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
METCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CODQL vs. METCB commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CODQL is a Buy and METCB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CODQL: $0.10 vs. METCB: $8.28)
Brand notoriety: CODQL and METCB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Coal industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CODQL: 13% vs. METCB: 116%
Market capitalization -- CODQL: $2.06B vs. METCB: $856.16M
CODQL [@Coal] is valued at $2.06B. METCB’s [@Coal] market capitalization is $856.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Coal] industry ranges from $75.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Coal] industry is $6.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CODQL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMETCB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CODQL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • METCB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CODQL and METCB are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CODQL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while METCB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CODQL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • METCB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, METCB is a better buy in the short-term than CODQL.

Price Growth

CODQL (@Coal) experienced а +9.16% price change this week, while METCB (@Coal) price change was +8.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Coal industry was +3.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

METCB is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Coal (+3.58% weekly)

Companies that mine, process and distribute coal and lignite. Coal goes towards around 30% of global energy production, and is heavily relied upon for electricity generation. Alliance Resource Partners, L.P., Peabody Energy Corporation and Arch Coal Inc. are major coal companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CODQL($2.06B) has a higher market cap than METCB($856M). METCB has higher P/E ratio than CODQL: METCB (7.20) vs CODQL (2.26). METCB YTD gains are higher at: -12.195 vs. CODQL (-78.486). CODQL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.24B vs. METCB (168M). CODQL has more cash in the bank: 335M vs. METCB (42M). METCB has less debt than CODQL: METCB (101M) vs CODQL (256M). CODQL has higher revenues than METCB: CODQL (3.53B) vs METCB (694M).
CODQLMETCBCODQL / METCB
Capitalization2.06B856M240%
EBITDA1.24B168M737%
Gain YTD-78.486-12.195644%
P/E Ratio2.267.2031%
Revenue3.53B694M508%
Total Cash335M42M798%
Total Debt256M101M253%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CODQLMETCB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CODQL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
METCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DGFAX31.230.10
+0.32%
Davis Global A
RIGGX43.000.08
+0.19%
American Funds Intl Gr and Inc R6
RSEDX17.35N/A
N/A
Columbia Large Cap Value Inst2
SLANX32.61N/A
N/A
DWS Latin America Equity A
DSMDX18.14N/A
N/A
Driehaus Small/Mid Cap Growth

CODQL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CODQL and TERCF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CODQL and TERCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CODQL
1D Price
Change %
CODQL100%
N/A
TERCF - CODQL
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
METCB - CODQL
8%
Poorly correlated
+4.87%

METCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, METCB has been loosely correlated with METC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if METCB jumps, then METC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To METCB
1D Price
Change %
METCB100%
+4.87%
METC - METCB
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
BTU - METCB
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
SXC - METCB
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.25%
AMR - METCB
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.81%
HNRG - METCB
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.21%
More