Advertisement
HCC vs METCB
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCC is a Hold and METCB is a StrongBuy.
| HCC | METCB | HCC / METCB | |
| Capitalization | 5.16B | 650M | 794% |
| EBITDA | 453M | -4.51M | -10,038% |
| Gain YTD | 11.188 | -46.390 | -24% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.50 | 73.36 | 32% |
| Revenue | 1.68B | 515M | 326% |
| Total Cash | 322M | 60M | 537% |
| Total Debt | 269M | 468M | 57% |
HCC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 70 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| HCC | METCB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 17 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 84% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HCC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while METCB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- HCC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- METCB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HCC’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while METCB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HCC’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
- METCB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
HCC (@Coal) experienced а -6.40% price change this week, while METCB (@Coal) price change was -10.54% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Coal industry was -8.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.79%.
Reported Earning Dates
HCC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Coal (-8.45% weekly)Companies that mine, process and distribute coal and lignite. Coal goes towards around 30% of global energy production, and is heavily relied upon for electricity generation. Alliance Resource Partners, L.P., Peabody Energy Corporation and Arch Coal Inc. are major coal companies in the U.S.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BBJP | 79.55 | 1.76 | +2.26% |
| JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF | |||
| GDMN | 94.47 | 1.29 | +1.38% |
| WisdomTree Efcnt Gld Pls Gld Ms Stgy ETF | |||
| MEMX | 48.78 | 0.66 | +1.36% |
| Matthews Emerging Markets Ex Chn Act ETF | |||
| BPAY | 26.65 | 0.10 | +0.39% |
| iShares FinTech Active ETF | |||
| SHYM | 21.77 | 0.08 | +0.37% |
| iShares Short Duration HY Muni Act ETF | |||
HCC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCC has been loosely correlated with SXC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HCC jumps, then SXC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HCC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCC | 100% | -3.82% | ||
| SXC - HCC | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| AMR - HCC | 30% Poorly correlated | -3.82% | ||
| AREC - HCC | 10% Poorly correlated | -2.28% | ||
| METC - HCC | -2% Poorly correlated | -2.27% | ||
| METCB - HCC | -6% Poorly correlated | -4.26% |
METCB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, METCB has been loosely correlated with METC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if METCB jumps, then METC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To METCB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| METCB | 100% | -4.26% | ||
| METC - METCB | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.27% | ||
| SXC - METCB | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| AREC - METCB | 36% Loosely correlated | -2.28% | ||
| HCC - METCB | 35% Loosely correlated | -3.82% | ||
| AMR - METCB | 3% Poorly correlated | -3.82% |