COF
Price
$211.01
Change
+$0.50 (+0.24%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
56.64B
24 days until earnings call
PYPL
Price
$73.64
Change
+$0.47 (+0.64%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
71.8B
31 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

COF vs PYPL

Header iconCOF vs PYPL Comparison
Open Charts COF vs PYPLBanner chart's image
Capital One Financial
Price$211.01
Change+$0.50 (+0.24%)
Volume$4.41M
Capitalization56.64B
PayPal Holdings
Price$73.64
Change+$0.47 (+0.64%)
Volume$10.45M
Capitalization71.8B
COF vs PYPL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
COF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PYPL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COF vs. PYPL commentary
Jun 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COF is a Buy and PYPL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2025
Stock price -- (COF: $211.01 vs. PYPL: $73.64)
Brand notoriety: COF and PYPL are both notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COF: 92% vs. PYPL: 99%
Market capitalization -- COF: $56.64B vs. PYPL: $71.8B
COF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $56.64B. PYPL’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $71.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whilePYPL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • COF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • PYPL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, COF is a better buy in the long-term than PYPL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PYPL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PYPL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COF is a better buy in the short-term than PYPL.

Price Growth

COF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +6.37% price change this week, while PYPL (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +5.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +4.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

COF is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

PYPL is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+4.25% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PYPL($71.8B) has a higher market cap than COF($56.6B). PYPL has higher P/E ratio than COF: PYPL (16.93) vs COF (12.16). COF YTD gains are higher at: 19.063 vs. PYPL (-13.720). PYPL has more cash in the bank: 14.1B vs. COF (3.36B). PYPL has less debt than COF: PYPL (9.68B) vs COF (49.3B). COF has higher revenues than PYPL: COF (36.8B) vs PYPL (29.8B).
COFPYPLCOF / PYPL
Capitalization56.6B71.8B79%
EBITDAN/A6.83B-
Gain YTD19.063-13.720-139%
P/E Ratio12.1616.9372%
Revenue36.8B29.8B123%
Total Cash3.36B14.1B24%
Total Debt49.3B9.68B510%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COF vs PYPL: Fundamental Ratings
COF
PYPL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1915
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
23100
SMR RATING
1..100
241
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1051
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1239
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

COF's Valuation (51) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PYPL (92) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that COF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

COF's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for PYPL (100) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that COF’s stock grew significantly faster than PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

COF's SMR Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PYPL (41) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that COF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

COF's Price Growth Rating (10) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PYPL (51) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that COF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

COF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as PYPL (39) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that COF’s stock grew similarly to PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COFPYPL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PYPL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KOP32.750.96
+3.02%
Koppers Holdings
GTES23.130.23
+1.00%
Gates Industrial Corp
JAKK20.500.01
+0.05%
JAKKS Pacific
PCG13.99-0.09
-0.64%
PG&E Corp
NCTY7.66-0.22
-2.83%
The9 Limited

COF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COF has been closely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COF jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COF
1D Price
Change %
COF100%
+0.24%
SYF - COF
89%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
OMF - COF
82%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
ENVA - COF
80%
Closely correlated
+5.17%
BFH - COF
80%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
SLM - COF
75%
Closely correlated
+1.98%
More

PYPL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PYPL has been loosely correlated with AXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PYPL jumps, then AXP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PYPL
1D Price
Change %
PYPL100%
+0.64%
AXP - PYPL
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.85%
SYF - PYPL
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
AL - PYPL
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
COF - PYPL
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
MA - PYPL
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
More