Ad is loading...
COF
Price
$185.14
Change
+$2.14 (+1.17%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
72 days until earnings call
RM
Price
$29.67
Change
-$0.06 (-0.20%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
80 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

COF vs RM

Header iconCOF vs RM Comparison
Open Charts COF vs RMBanner chart's image
Capital One Financial
Price$185.14
Change+$2.14 (+1.17%)
Volume$4.12M
CapitalizationN/A
REGIONAL MANAGEMENT
Price$29.67
Change-$0.06 (-0.20%)
Volume$30.43K
CapitalizationN/A
COF vs RM Comparison Chart
Loading...
COF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
RM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COF vs. RM commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COF is a StrongSell and RM is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (COF: $185.14 vs. RM: $29.67)
Brand notoriety: COF: Notable vs. RM: Not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COF: 145% vs. RM: 134%
Market capitalization -- COF: $56.64B vs. RM: $236.25M
COF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $56.64B. RM’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $236.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileRM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • COF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • RM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, COF is a better buy in the long-term than RM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COF is a better buy in the short-term than RM.

Price Growth

COF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +0.29% price change this week, while RM (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -4.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

COF is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2025.

RM is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-0.51% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COF($56.6B) has a higher market cap than RM($236M). RM has higher P/E ratio than COF: RM (14.49) vs COF (12.16). COF YTD gains are higher at: 43.528 vs. RM (22.309). COF has more cash in the bank: 3.36B vs. RM (7.41M). RM has less debt than COF: RM (1.43B) vs COF (49.3B). COF has higher revenues than RM: COF (36.8B) vs RM (484M).
COFRMCOF / RM
Capitalization56.6B236M23,983%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD43.52822.309195%
P/E Ratio12.1614.4984%
Revenue36.8B484M7,603%
Total Cash3.36B7.41M45,326%
Total Debt49.3B1.43B3,443%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COF vs RM: Fundamental Ratings
COF
RM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2575
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2785
SMR RATING
1..100
213
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
453
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
922
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RM's Valuation (16) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for COF (91) in the Major Banks industry. This means that RM’s stock grew significantly faster than COF’s over the last 12 months.

COF's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RM (85) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that COF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RM’s over the last 12 months.

COF's SMR Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as RM (13) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that COF’s stock grew similarly to RM’s over the last 12 months.

COF's Price Growth Rating (4) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RM (53) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that COF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RM’s over the last 12 months.

COF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as RM (22) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that COF’s stock grew similarly to RM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COFRM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
COF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
RM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OOMA13.390.02
+0.15%
Ooma
TW128.850.15
+0.12%
Tradeweb Markets
PAGP18.230.02
+0.11%
Plains GP Holdings LP
DH4.29-0.17
-3.81%
Definitive Healthcare Corp
STBX1.41-0.17
-10.76%
Starbox Group Holdings Ltd

COF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COF has been closely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COF jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COF
1D Price
Change %
COF100%
+1.17%
SYF - COF
84%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
SLM - COF
69%
Closely correlated
+1.87%
OMF - COF
68%
Closely correlated
+1.31%
BFH - COF
66%
Closely correlated
+3.17%
ENVA - COF
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
More