COF
Price
$178.66
Change
+$3.00 (+1.71%)
Updated
Dec 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
36 days until earnings call
WLFC
Price
$204.65
Change
+$5.95 (+2.99%)
Updated
Dec 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Ad is loading...

COF vs WLFC

Header iconCOF vs WLFC Comparison
Open Charts COF vs WLFCBanner chart's image
Capital One Financial
Price$178.66
Change+$3.00 (+1.71%)
Volume$50.23K
CapitalizationN/A
Willis Lease Finance
Price$204.65
Change+$5.95 (+2.99%)
Volume$754
CapitalizationN/A
COF vs WLFC Comparison Chart
Loading...
COF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COF vs. WLFC commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COF is a Hold and WLFC is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (COF: $178.65 vs. WLFC: $205.05)
Brand notoriety: COF: Notable vs. WLFC: Not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COF: 163% vs. WLFC: 96%
Market capitalization -- COF: $56.64B vs. WLFC: $317.24M
COF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $56.64B. WLFC’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $317.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWLFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • COF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WLFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both COF and WLFC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WLFC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WLFC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WLFC is a better buy in the short-term than COF.

Price Growth

COF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -3.19% price change this week, while WLFC (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -2.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -2.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

COF is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2025.

WLFC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-2.26% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COF($56.6B) has a higher market cap than WLFC($317M). COF has higher P/E ratio than WLFC: COF (12.16) vs WLFC (7.86). WLFC YTD gains are higher at: 327.702 vs. COF (38.497). COF has more cash in the bank: 3.36B vs. WLFC (7.07M). WLFC has less debt than COF: WLFC (1.8B) vs COF (49.3B). COF has higher revenues than WLFC: COF (36.8B) vs WLFC (419M).
COFWLFCCOF / WLFC
Capitalization56.6B317M17,855%
EBITDAN/A237M-
Gain YTD38.497327.70212%
P/E Ratio12.167.86155%
Revenue36.8B419M8,783%
Total Cash3.36B7.07M47,518%
Total Debt49.3B1.8B2,734%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COF vs WLFC: Fundamental Ratings
COF
WLFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
305
SMR RATING
1..100
247
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4134
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
177
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WLFC's Valuation (80) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as COF (89) in the Major Banks industry. This means that WLFC’s stock grew similarly to COF’s over the last 12 months.

WLFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as COF (30) in the Major Banks industry. This means that WLFC’s stock grew similarly to COF’s over the last 12 months.

COF's SMR Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WLFC (47) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that COF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WLFC’s over the last 12 months.

WLFC's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as COF (41) in the Major Banks industry. This means that WLFC’s stock grew similarly to COF’s over the last 12 months.

WLFC's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as COF (17) in the Major Banks industry. This means that WLFC’s stock grew similarly to COF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COFWLFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
COF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LSTA2.710.19
+7.54%
Lisata Therapeutics
WDC60.240.62
+1.04%
Western Digital Corp
RPAY7.78-0.11
-1.39%
Repay Holdings Corp
CAMT83.36-1.29
-1.52%
Camtek Ltd
NC28.31-0.54
-1.87%
NACCO Industries

COF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COF has been closely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COF jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COF
1D Price
Change %
COF100%
+1.70%
SYF - COF
84%
Closely correlated
+1.84%
OMF - COF
69%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
SLM - COF
68%
Closely correlated
+1.16%
ENVA - COF
67%
Closely correlated
+1.56%
BFH - COF
66%
Loosely correlated
+2.18%
More

WLFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WLFC has been loosely correlated with NNI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WLFC jumps, then NNI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLFC
1D Price
Change %
WLFC100%
+3.20%
NNI - WLFC
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
GDOT - WLFC
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
AL - WLFC
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
SLM - WLFC
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.16%
COF - WLFC
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.70%
More