It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
COHN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHIVE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
COHN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HIVE’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
COHN (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +12.77% price change this week, while HIVE (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +1.79% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -2.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.07%.
COHN is expected to report earnings on May 02, 2025.
HIVE is expected to report earnings on Jun 26, 2025.
These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
COHN | HIVE | COHN / HIVE | |
Capitalization | 13.8M | 312M | 4% |
EBITDA | 23M | 29.1M | 79% |
Gain YTD | 20.817 | -20.351 | -102% |
P/E Ratio | 1.76 | 6.72 | 26% |
Revenue | 83M | 121M | 69% |
Total Cash | 98.7M | 24.7M | 400% |
Total Debt | 149M | 32.9M | 453% |
COHN | HIVE | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 94 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 42 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
COHN's Valuation (9) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HIVE (68) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that COHN’s stock grew somewhat faster than HIVE’s over the last 12 months.
COHN's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as HIVE (94) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that COHN’s stock grew similarly to HIVE’s over the last 12 months.
COHN's SMR Rating (90) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as HIVE (90) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that COHN’s stock grew similarly to HIVE’s over the last 12 months.
COHN's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as HIVE (48) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that COHN’s stock grew similarly to HIVE’s over the last 12 months.
COHN's P/E Growth Rating (91) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as HIVE (100) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that COHN’s stock grew similarly to HIVE’s over the last 12 months.
COHN | HIVE | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 1 day ago83% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago85% | 1 day ago85% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 1 day ago89% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago84% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 1 day ago87% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago75% | 5 days ago86% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 1 day ago89% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago89% | 1 day ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 1 day ago87% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that COHN and NDAQ have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that COHN and NDAQ's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COHN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
COHN | 100% | -2.07% | ||
NDAQ - COHN | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.43% | ||
IREN - COHN | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.32% | ||
HIVE - COHN | 20% Poorly correlated | -3.40% | ||
BTM - COHN | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.95% | ||
GREE - COHN | 20% Poorly correlated | -6.99% | ||
More |