Advertisement
COHN vs HIVE
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COHN is a Hold and HIVE is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
COHN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHIVE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- COHN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- HIVE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
COHN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HIVE’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- COHN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- HIVE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
COHN (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +11.75% price change this week, while HIVE (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +7.14% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +2.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.29%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+2.62% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| COHN | HIVE | COHN / HIVE | |
| Capitalization | 25.9M | 501M | 5% |
| EBITDA | -8.86M | 64M | -14% |
| Gain YTD | 30.111 | -21.053 | -143% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.37 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 89.8M | 117M | 77% |
| Total Cash | 137M | 40.5M | 338% |
| Total Debt | 128M | 25.2M | 508% |
COHN | HIVE | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 74 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 8 Undervalued | 70 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 95 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
COHN's Valuation (8) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HIVE (70) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that COHN’s stock grew somewhat faster than HIVE’s over the last 12 months.
COHN's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as HIVE (95) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that COHN’s stock grew similarly to HIVE’s over the last 12 months.
HIVE's SMR Rating (91) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as COHN (92) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that HIVE’s stock grew similarly to COHN’s over the last 12 months.
COHN's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as HIVE (60) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that COHN’s stock grew similarly to HIVE’s over the last 12 months.
COHN's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for HIVE (100) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that COHN’s stock grew significantly faster than HIVE’s over the last 12 months.
| COHN | HIVE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 79% | 8 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 84% |
Advertisement
COHN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that COHN and NDAQ have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that COHN and NDAQ's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COHN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COHN | 100% | +4.00% | ||
| NDAQ - COHN | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.18% | ||
| HIVE - COHN | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.90% | ||
| BTM - COHN | 20% Poorly correlated | -7.22% | ||
| BITF - COHN | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GREE - COHN | 20% Poorly correlated | -4.76% | ||
More | ||||