COLM
Price
$85.24
Change
+$0.98 (+1.16%)
Updated
Mar 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.84B
44 days until earnings call
HMRZF
Price
$14.75
Change
+$1.14 (+8.38%)
Updated
Feb 14 closing price
Capitalization
27.35B
Ad is loading...

COLM vs HMRZF

Header iconCOLM vs HMRZF Comparison
Open Charts COLM vs HMRZFBanner chart's image
Columbia Sportswear
Price$85.24
Change+$0.98 (+1.16%)
Volume$9.36K
Capitalization4.84B
Hennes & Mauritz AB
Price$14.75
Change+$1.14 (+8.38%)
Volume$621
Capitalization27.35B
COLM vs HMRZF Comparison Chart
Loading...
COLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COLM vs. HMRZF commentary
Mar 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COLM is a Hold and HMRZF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 11, 2025
Stock price -- (COLM: $84.26 vs. HMRZF: $14.75)
Brand notoriety: COLM and HMRZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Apparel/Footwear industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COLM: 109% vs. HMRZF: 146%
Market capitalization -- COLM: $4.84B vs. HMRZF: $27.35B
COLM [@Apparel/Footwear] is valued at $4.84B. HMRZF’s [@Apparel/Footwear] market capitalization is $27.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry ranges from $140.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry is $6.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COLM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHMRZF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • COLM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HMRZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HMRZF is a better buy in the long-term than COLM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COLM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • COLM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

COLM (@Apparel/Footwear) experienced а -2.97% price change this week, while HMRZF (@Apparel/Footwear) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was -2.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

COLM is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Apparel/Footwear (-2.67% weekly)

Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HMRZF($27.3B) has a higher market cap than COLM($4.85B). HMRZF has higher P/E ratio than COLM: HMRZF (82.64) vs COLM (19.81). HMRZF YTD gains are higher at: 11.827 vs. COLM (0.393). HMRZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 29.3B vs. COLM (462M). HMRZF has more cash in the bank: 20.2B vs. COLM (765M). COLM has less debt than HMRZF: COLM (408M) vs HMRZF (63.3B). HMRZF has higher revenues than COLM: HMRZF (232B) vs COLM (3.49B).
COLMHMRZFCOLM / HMRZF
Capitalization4.85B27.3B18%
EBITDA462M29.3B2%
Gain YTD0.39311.8273%
P/E Ratio19.8182.6424%
Revenue3.49B232B2%
Total Cash765M20.2B4%
Total Debt408M63.3B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COLM vs HMRZF: Fundamental Ratings
COLM
HMRZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
6139
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5148
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3583
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HMRZF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as COLM (49) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that HMRZF’s stock grew similarly to COLM’s over the last 12 months.

HMRZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as COLM (100) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that HMRZF’s stock grew similarly to COLM’s over the last 12 months.

HMRZF's SMR Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as COLM (61) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that HMRZF’s stock grew similarly to COLM’s over the last 12 months.

HMRZF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as COLM (51) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that HMRZF’s stock grew similarly to COLM’s over the last 12 months.

COLM's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HMRZF (83) in the null industry. This means that COLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than HMRZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COLM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
COLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EUFN29.020.51
+1.79%
iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF
NUGT51.440.66
+1.30%
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X ETF
CLIX47.610.10
+0.21%
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF
UPAR13.740.02
+0.18%
UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF
MUSI43.73-0.06
-0.13%
American Century Multisector Income ETF

COLM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COLM has been loosely correlated with PVH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COLM jumps, then PVH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COLM
1D Price
Change %
COLM100%
+0.58%
PVH - COLM
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
KTB - COLM
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.14%
SHOO - COLM
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.83%
CAL - COLM
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.90%
OXM - COLM
43%
Loosely correlated
+4.10%
More

HMRZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HMRZF and HNNMY have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HMRZF and HNNMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HMRZF
1D Price
Change %
HMRZF100%
N/A
HNNMY - HMRZF
30%
Poorly correlated
+3.64%
MCRAB - HMRZF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GOOS - HMRZF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
SHOO - HMRZF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.83%
COLM - HMRZF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
More