COLM
Price
$49.67
Change
-$1.03 (-2.03%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:27 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.78B
73 days until earnings call
HMRZF
Price
$13.93
Change
-$0.47 (-3.26%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
23.26B
Interact to see
Advertisement

COLM vs HMRZF

Header iconCOLM vs HMRZF Comparison
Open Charts COLM vs HMRZFBanner chart's image
Columbia Sportswear
Price$49.67
Change-$1.03 (-2.03%)
Volume$737
Capitalization2.78B
Hennes & Mauritz AB
Price$13.93
Change-$0.47 (-3.26%)
Volume$100
Capitalization23.26B
COLM vs HMRZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
COLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HMRZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COLM vs. HMRZF commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COLM is a StrongBuy and HMRZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (COLM: $50.70 vs. HMRZF: $13.93)
Brand notoriety: COLM and HMRZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Apparel/Footwear industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COLM: 102% vs. HMRZF: 39%
Market capitalization -- COLM: $2.78B vs. HMRZF: $23.26B
COLM [@Apparel/Footwear] is valued at $2.78B. HMRZF’s [@Apparel/Footwear] market capitalization is $23.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry ranges from $23.26B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry is $3.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COLM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHMRZF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • COLM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HMRZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HMRZF is a better buy in the long-term than COLM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COLM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HMRZF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COLM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HMRZF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COLM is a better buy in the short-term than HMRZF.

Price Growth

COLM (@Apparel/Footwear) experienced а +2.84% price change this week, while HMRZF (@Apparel/Footwear) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

COLM is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Apparel/Footwear (-0.28% weekly)

Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HMRZF($23.3B) has a higher market cap than COLM($2.78B). HMRZF has higher P/E ratio than COLM: HMRZF (21.76) vs COLM (13.03). HMRZF YTD gains are higher at: 5.610 vs. COLM (-39.095). HMRZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 38.4B vs. COLM (327M). HMRZF has more cash in the bank: 16.3B vs. COLM (658M). COLM has less debt than HMRZF: COLM (457M) vs HMRZF (56.4B). HMRZF has higher revenues than COLM: HMRZF (233B) vs COLM (3.38B).
COLMHMRZFCOLM / HMRZF
Capitalization2.78B23.3B12%
EBITDA327M38.4B1%
Gain YTD-39.0955.610-697%
P/E Ratio13.0321.7660%
Revenue3.38B233B1%
Total Cash658M16.3B4%
Total Debt457M56.4B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COLM vs HMRZF: Fundamental Ratings
COLM
HMRZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
6238
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9051
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9254
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HMRZF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is in the same range as COLM (34) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that HMRZF’s stock grew similarly to COLM’s over the last 12 months.

HMRZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as COLM (100) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that HMRZF’s stock grew similarly to COLM’s over the last 12 months.

HMRZF's SMR Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as COLM (62) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that HMRZF’s stock grew similarly to COLM’s over the last 12 months.

HMRZF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COLM (90) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that HMRZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than COLM’s over the last 12 months.

HMRZF's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COLM (92) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that HMRZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than COLM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COLMHMRZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
53%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HMRZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BLZE7.140.46
+6.89%
Backblaze
INMD14.37N/A
N/A
InMode Ltd
IPWR4.06-0.02
-0.51%
Ideal Power
STVN23.63-0.57
-2.36%
Stevanato Group SpA

COLM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COLM has been loosely correlated with SHOO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COLM jumps, then SHOO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COLM
1D Price
Change %
COLM100%
-0.53%
SHOO - COLM
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.82%
PVH - COLM
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.14%
OXM - COLM
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
VFC - COLM
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.83%
KTB - COLM
58%
Loosely correlated
+5.64%
More

HMRZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HMRZF and HNNMY have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HMRZF and HNNMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HMRZF
1D Price
Change %
HMRZF100%
N/A
HNNMY - HMRZF
30%
Poorly correlated
+4.73%
MCRAB - HMRZF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GOOS - HMRZF
10%
Poorly correlated
-2.01%
SHOO - HMRZF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
COLM - HMRZF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
More