Columbia Sportswear (COLM) and PVH Corp. (PVH) represent two established players in the apparel and outdoor products industry. This comparison examines their relative performance, business positioning, and recent market dynamics to assist traders and investors evaluating opportunities in the consumer discretionary sector. The analysis focuses on verifiable metrics such as price movements, valuation indicators, and sector influences, providing a neutral framework for those assessing portfolio allocation or short-term trading strategies.
Columbia Sportswear Company designs, sources, and markets outdoor apparel, footwear, and accessories under the Columbia brand and related labels. In recent market activity, COLM shares have traded near the upper end of their 52-week range, closing around $66.18 following a modest daily decline. Over the past month, the stock posted gains near 9%, supported by improved sentiment in the broader retail environment. Year-to-date returns reached approximately 19%, though the one-year performance remained modest at under 4%. Factors influencing recent behavior include steady demand for performance outerwear and operational efficiencies that have helped maintain profitability amid variable input costs.
PVH Corp. owns and operates iconic apparel brands including Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger, focusing on premium and lifestyle segments. In recent market activity, PVH shares closed near $93.28 after a single-day decline of about 3.6%. The stock has recorded a strong year-to-date advance exceeding 37%, with one-year returns around 7%. Monthly performance showed limited movement near 1%. Recent influences on sentiment include solid quarterly results driven by brand momentum and international sales, tempered by broader concerns over discretionary spending in key markets.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of high-performing AI trading bots from a library of hundreds that collectively analyze and trade thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating superior alignment with prevailing market conditions, consistent risk-adjusted returns, and robust statistical profiles earn placement in this section. Available bots span diverse trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics, with many achieving win rates between 55% and 75% alongside varying drawdown levels. This resource enables users to explore tailored algorithmic approaches without manual strategy development. Review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page to identify options suited to individual objectives.
COLM emphasizes functional outdoor and performance products with a focus on weather-resistant apparel, while PVH leverages premium fashion positioning through its Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger portfolios. Growth drivers differ accordingly, with COLM benefiting from outdoor recreation trends and PVH from brand-driven lifestyle demand. Recent momentum favors COLM on shorter-term charts, whereas PVH shows stronger cumulative gains over the year-to-date period. Risk factors include supply chain exposure for both, alongside PVH’s higher debt-to-equity profile compared to COLM’s more conservative balance sheet. Sector exposure centers on consumer discretionary spending, with sentiment influenced by macroeconomic indicators such as employment data and inflation readings. Trade-offs center on COLM’s relative stability versus PVH’s potential for amplified upside in favorable retail cycles.
Based on observable trend consistency, relative price stability in recent weeks, and positioning within the sector, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a modestly higher probabilistic preference to COLM for shorter-term considerations. PVH demonstrates stronger cumulative momentum on extended timeframes. This assessment reflects pattern recognition across multiple indicators rather than definitive forecasts, and outcomes remain subject to evolving market conditions.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
COLM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePVH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
COLM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PVH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
COLM (@Apparel/Footwear) experienced а -3.11% price change this week, while PVH (@Apparel/Footwear) price change was -6.35% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was -1.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.64%.
COLM is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
PVH is expected to report earnings on Sep 01, 2026.
Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.
| COLM | PVH | COLM / PVH | |
| Capitalization | 3.31B | 3.6B | 92% |
| EBITDA | 289M | 971M | 30% |
| Gain YTD | 18.806 | 16.449 | 114% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.70 | 23.63 | 88% |
| Revenue | 3.4B | 8.99B | 38% |
| Total Cash | 535M | 592M | 90% |
| Total Debt | 473M | 4.22B | 11% |
COLM | PVH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 28 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | 59 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 71 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 7 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
COLM's Valuation (28) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as PVH (59). This means that COLM’s stock grew similarly to PVH’s over the last 12 months.
COLM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as PVH (100). This means that COLM’s stock grew similarly to PVH’s over the last 12 months.
COLM's SMR Rating (71) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as PVH (89). This means that COLM’s stock grew similarly to PVH’s over the last 12 months.
COLM's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as PVH (48). This means that COLM’s stock grew similarly to PVH’s over the last 12 months.
PVH's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as COLM (28). This means that PVH’s stock grew similarly to COLM’s over the last 12 months.
| COLM | PVH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 49% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 66% | 6 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 81% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PRN | 262.64 | 7.31 | +2.86% |
| Invesco Dorsey Wright IndustrialsMomtETF | |||
| AIVC | 118.53 | 0.42 | +0.36% |
| Amplify Global Cloud Technology ETF | |||
| BKEM | 98.87 | 0.31 | +0.31% |
| BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF | |||
| DRKY | 20.07 | -0.15 | -0.76% |
| VistaShares Target 15 DRUKMacro Dis ETF | |||
| NLR | 124.55 | -2.39 | -1.88% |
| VanEck Uranium & Nuclear ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COLM has been loosely correlated with SHOO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COLM jumps, then SHOO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COLM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COLM | 100% | -2.51% | ||
| SHOO - COLM | 63% Loosely correlated | -3.30% | ||
| GIII - COLM | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.50% | ||
| VFC - COLM | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.73% | ||
| NKE - COLM | 56% Loosely correlated | -4.45% | ||
| PVH - COLM | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.17% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PVH has been loosely correlated with SHOO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PVH jumps, then SHOO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PVH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PVH | 100% | +1.17% | ||
| SHOO - PVH | 57% Loosely correlated | -3.30% | ||
| COLM - PVH | 55% Loosely correlated | -2.51% | ||
| LEVI - PVH | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| WWW - PVH | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| GIII - PVH | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.50% | ||
More | ||||