Advertisement
COMM vs SILC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COMM is a Hold and SILC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
COMM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSILC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- COMM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SILC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
COMM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SILC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- COMM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SILC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
COMM (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а -4.13% price change this week, while SILC (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was +2.41% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was -2.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.70%.
Reported Earning Dates
COMM is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
SILC is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Telecommunications Equipment (-2.37% weekly)The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.
| COMM | SILC | COMM / SILC | |
| Capitalization | 284M | 98.4M | 289% |
| EBITDA | 519M | 16.1M | 3,224% |
| Gain YTD | 11.516 | -8.890 | -130% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 7.53 | - |
| Revenue | 5.79B | 151M | 3,834% |
| Total Cash | 544M | 49.7M | 1,095% |
| Total Debt | 9.32B | 6.54M | 142,344% |
COMM | SILC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 86 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | 48 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 74 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SILC's Valuation (48) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COMM (91) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that SILC’s stock grew somewhat faster than COMM’s over the last 12 months.
SILC's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as COMM (100) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that SILC’s stock grew similarly to COMM’s over the last 12 months.
SILC's SMR Rating (91) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as COMM (99) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that SILC’s stock grew similarly to COMM’s over the last 12 months.
COMM's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SILC (74) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that COMM’s stock grew somewhat faster than SILC’s over the last 12 months.
COMM's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as SILC (97) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that COMM’s stock grew similarly to SILC’s over the last 12 months.
| COMM | SILC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 60% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LAAFX | 19.24 | -0.19 | -0.98% |
| Lord Abbett Affiliated F | |||
| DLQIX | 15.11 | -0.16 | -1.05% |
| BNY Mellon Large Cap Equity I | |||
| QTERX | 11.46 | -0.14 | -1.21% |
| AQR Emerging Multi-Style II R6 | |||
| BADEX | 10.92 | -0.14 | -1.27% |
| BlackRock Defensive Advantage EM Inv A | |||
| IRLNX | 73.53 | -0.95 | -1.28% |
| Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Idx Port I | |||
COMM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COMM has been loosely correlated with ZBRA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COMM jumps, then ZBRA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COMM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COMM | 100% | -8.21% | ||
| ZBRA - COMM | 50% Loosely correlated | -3.10% | ||
| DGII - COMM | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.97% | ||
| CIEN - COMM | 45% Loosely correlated | -2.66% | ||
| EXTR - COMM | 45% Loosely correlated | -3.71% | ||
| CLFD - COMM | 45% Loosely correlated | -3.38% | ||
More | ||||
SILC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SILC has been loosely correlated with JNPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SILC jumps, then JNPR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SILC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SILC | 100% | -0.93% | ||
| JNPR - SILC | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| COMM - SILC | 27% Poorly correlated | -8.21% | ||
| BOXL - SILC | 26% Poorly correlated | -3.39% | ||
| ASTS - SILC | 26% Poorly correlated | +3.93% | ||
| UI - SILC | 25% Poorly correlated | -3.78% | ||
More | ||||