COMM
Price
$17.03
Change
+$0.36 (+2.16%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.69B
92 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SILC
Price
$14.13
Change
-$0.59 (-4.01%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
83.49M
71 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COMM vs SILC

Header iconCOMM vs SILC Comparison
Open Charts COMM vs SILCBanner chart's image
CommScope Holding
Price$17.03
Change+$0.36 (+2.16%)
Volume$54.41K
Capitalization3.69B
Silicom
Price$14.13
Change-$0.59 (-4.01%)
Volume$100
Capitalization83.49M
COMM vs SILC Comparison Chart in %
COMM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SILC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COMM vs. SILC commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COMM is a Hold and SILC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (COMM: $16.66 vs. SILC: $14.72)
Brand notoriety: COMM: Notable vs. SILC: Not notable
Both companies represent the Telecommunications Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COMM: 74% vs. SILC: 87%
Market capitalization -- COMM: $3.77B vs. SILC: $80.15M
COMM [@Telecommunications Equipment] is valued at $3.77B. SILC’s [@Telecommunications Equipment] market capitalization is $80.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $309.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $9.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COMM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSILC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • COMM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SILC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, COMM is a better buy in the long-term than SILC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COMM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SILC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COMM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SILC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COMM is a better buy in the short-term than SILC.

Price Growth

COMM (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а -4.80% price change this week, while SILC (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was -0.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was -4.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

COMM is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

SILC is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Telecommunications Equipment (-4.80% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COMM($3.69B) has a higher market cap than SILC($83.5M). COMM YTD gains are higher at: 219.770 vs. SILC (-9.779). COMM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.1B vs. SILC (-13.03M). COMM has more cash in the bank: 705M vs. SILC (55.1M). SILC has less debt than COMM: SILC (6.41M) vs COMM (7.29B). COMM has higher revenues than SILC: COMM (5.3B) vs SILC (59.5M).
COMMSILCCOMM / SILC
Capitalization3.69B83.5M4,420%
EBITDA1.1B-13.03M-8,443%
Gain YTD219.770-9.779-2,247%
P/E Ratio14.24N/A-
Revenue5.3B59.5M8,906%
Total Cash705M55.1M1,279%
Total Debt7.29B6.41M113,648%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COMM vs SILC: Fundamental Ratings
COMM
SILC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2071
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
75100
SMR RATING
1..100
10091
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3576
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9996
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SILC's Valuation (69) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as COMM (80) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that SILC’s stock grew similarly to COMM’s over the last 12 months.

COMM's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as SILC (100) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that COMM’s stock grew similarly to SILC’s over the last 12 months.

SILC's SMR Rating (91) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as COMM (100) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that SILC’s stock grew similarly to COMM’s over the last 12 months.

COMM's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SILC (76) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that COMM’s stock grew somewhat faster than SILC’s over the last 12 months.

SILC's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as COMM (99) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that SILC’s stock grew similarly to COMM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COMMSILC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COMM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SILC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MIDLF0.420.11
+35.48%
Midland Expl Inc.
ZAPPF0.07N/A
+4.48%
Zapp Electric Vehicles Group Limited
AWAEF0.14N/A
N/A
SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.
KOJAF12.30N/A
N/A
Kojamo PLC
SNNUF16.00-0.90
-5.33%
Smith & Nephew PLC

COMM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COMM has been loosely correlated with NTGR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COMM jumps, then NTGR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COMM
1D Price
Change %
COMM100%
+0.91%
NTGR - COMM
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.61%
EXTR - COMM
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.76%
CIEN - COMM
44%
Loosely correlated
-2.49%
BDC - COMM
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.73%
LITE - COMM
43%
Loosely correlated
+2.17%
More

SILC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SILC and COMM have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SILC and COMM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SILC
1D Price
Change %
SILC100%
+3.26%
COMM - SILC
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.91%
ZBRA - SILC
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
BOXL - SILC
26%
Poorly correlated
-5.13%
HPE - SILC
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.55%
FIEE - SILC
22%
Poorly correlated
+16.27%
More