COMM
Price
$5.39
Change
+$0.02 (+0.37%)
Updated
Apr 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
283.87M
28 days until earnings call
SILC
Price
$14.62
Change
-$0.06 (-0.41%)
Updated
Apr 2 closing price
Capitalization
98.39M
28 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

COMM vs SILC

Header iconCOMM vs SILC Comparison
Open Charts COMM vs SILCBanner chart's image
CommScope Holding
Price$5.39
Change+$0.02 (+0.37%)
Volume$79.82K
Capitalization283.87M
Silicom
Price$14.62
Change-$0.06 (-0.41%)
Volume$16.36K
Capitalization98.39M
COMM vs SILC Comparison Chart
Loading...
COMM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SILC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COMM vs. SILC commentary
Apr 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COMM is a Hold and SILC is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 03, 2025
Stock price -- (COMM: $5.37 vs. SILC: $14.68)
Brand notoriety: COMM: Notable vs. SILC: Not notable
Both companies represent the Telecommunications Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COMM: 107% vs. SILC: 71%
Market capitalization -- COMM: $283.87M vs. SILC: $98.39M
COMM [@Telecommunications Equipment] is valued at $283.87M. SILC’s [@Telecommunications Equipment] market capitalization is $98.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $202.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $5.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COMM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSILC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • COMM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SILC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, COMM is a better buy in the long-term than SILC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COMM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SILC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COMM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SILC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both COMM and SILC are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

COMM (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а -8.52% price change this week, while SILC (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was -1.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was -2.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

COMM is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

SILC is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Telecommunications Equipment (-2.71% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COMM($284M) has a higher market cap than SILC($98.4M). COMM YTD gains are higher at: 3.071 vs. SILC (-10.362). COMM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 519M vs. SILC (16.1M). COMM has more cash in the bank: 544M vs. SILC (49.7M). SILC has less debt than COMM: SILC (6.54M) vs COMM (9.32B). COMM has higher revenues than SILC: COMM (5.79B) vs SILC (151M).
COMMSILCCOMM / SILC
Capitalization284M98.4M289%
EBITDA519M16.1M3,224%
Gain YTD3.071-10.362-30%
P/E RatioN/A7.53-
Revenue5.79B151M3,834%
Total Cash544M49.7M1,095%
Total Debt9.32B6.54M142,344%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COMM vs SILC: Fundamental Ratings
COMM
SILC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
68
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10096
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3758
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7196
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SILC's Valuation (61) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COMM (94) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that SILC’s stock grew somewhat faster than COMM’s over the last 12 months.

SILC's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as COMM (100) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that SILC’s stock grew similarly to COMM’s over the last 12 months.

SILC's SMR Rating (96) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as COMM (100) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that SILC’s stock grew similarly to COMM’s over the last 12 months.

COMM's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as SILC (58) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that COMM’s stock grew similarly to SILC’s over the last 12 months.

COMM's P/E Growth Rating (71) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as SILC (96) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that COMM’s stock grew similarly to SILC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COMMSILC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
COMM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SILC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EKWCX65.27N/A
N/A
Allspring Precious Metals C
SPRAX23.55N/A
N/A
PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Val A
PSGQX26.69N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Focused Growth R6
LTFOX18.89N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Affiliated F3
GMNAX10.40N/A
N/A
Gabelli Global Mini Mites A

COMM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COMM has been loosely correlated with BDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COMM jumps, then BDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COMM
1D Price
Change %
COMM100%
+1.13%
BDC - COMM
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
CLFD - COMM
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.58%
NTGR - COMM
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.88%
CIEN - COMM
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.84%
ZBRA - COMM
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
More

SILC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SILC has been loosely correlated with JNPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SILC jumps, then JNPR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SILC
1D Price
Change %
SILC100%
-0.41%
JNPR - SILC
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
COMM - SILC
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
ASTS - SILC
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.56%
UI - SILC
25%
Poorly correlated
+4.48%
BOXL - SILC
25%
Poorly correlated
+4.17%
More