Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CONWX vs FBAFX
CONWX vs FBAFX Comparison
Open Charts CONWX vs FBAFX
CONWX vs FBAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBAFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. CONWX (42.4M). CONWX pays higher dividends than FBAFX: CONWX (2.78) vs FBAFX (2.00). CONWX was incepted earlier than FBAFX: CONWX (39 years) vs FBAFX (6 years). CONWX (1.80) is less costly to investors than FBAFX (0.33). FBAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. CONWX (13.00). FBAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CONWX: FBAFX (250) vs CONWX (500). CONWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.10 vs. FBAFX (12.33). FBAFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.56 vs. CONWX (13.02).
| CONWX | FBAFX | CONWX / FBAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.33 | 545% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.33 | 545% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.149 | 8.675 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 250 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4M | 288B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.78 | 2.00 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.10 | 12.33 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.69 | 40.69 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.02 | 36.56 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement