CONXF
Price
$0.54
Change
+$0.03 (+5.88%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
47.7M
SMRVF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.02 (-22.22%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
1.6M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CONXF vs SMRVF

Header iconCONXF vs SMRVF Comparison
Open Charts CONXF vs SMRVFBanner chart's image
NICKEL 28 CAP
Price$0.54
Change+$0.03 (+5.88%)
Volume$27.3K
Capitalization47.7M
Smooth Rock Ventures
Price$0.07
Change-$0.02 (-22.22%)
Volume$48.78K
Capitalization1.6M
CONXF vs SMRVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CONXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMRVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CONXF vs. SMRVF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CONXF is a StrongBuy and SMRVF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CONXF: $0.54 vs. SMRVF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: CONXF and SMRVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CONXF: 367% vs. SMRVF: 458%
Market capitalization -- CONXF: $47.7M vs. SMRVF: $1.6M
CONXF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $47.7M. SMRVF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.6M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CONXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSMRVF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CONXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SMRVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CONXF is a better buy in the long-term than SMRVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CONXF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMRVF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CONXF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SMRVF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CONXF is a better buy in the short-term than SMRVF.

Price Growth

CONXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +7.85% price change this week, while SMRVF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -20.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +5.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +42.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +308.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+5.57% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CONXF($47.7M) has a higher market cap than SMRVF($1.6M). SMRVF YTD gains are higher at: 14.400 vs. CONXF (7.080). CONXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 705K vs. SMRVF (-121.07K). CONXF has more cash in the bank: 8.6M vs. SMRVF (284K). CONXF (0) and SMRVF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CONXFSMRVFCONXF / SMRVF
Capitalization47.7M1.6M2,974%
EBITDA705K-121.07K-582%
Gain YTD7.08014.40049%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash8.6M284K3,027%
Total Debt37MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CONXF vs SMRVF: Fundamental Ratings
CONXF
SMRVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2690
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
92100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5741
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9014

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CONXF's Valuation (51) in the null industry is in the same range as SMRVF (55). This means that CONXF’s stock grew similarly to SMRVF’s over the last 12 months.

CONXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SMRVF (100). This means that CONXF’s stock grew similarly to SMRVF’s over the last 12 months.

CONXF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as SMRVF (100). This means that CONXF’s stock grew similarly to SMRVF’s over the last 12 months.

SMRVF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as CONXF (57). This means that SMRVF’s stock grew similarly to CONXF’s over the last 12 months.

CONXF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SMRVF (100). This means that CONXF’s stock grew significantly faster than SMRVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CONXFSMRVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CONXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMRVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GOLXF0.03N/A
+4.04%
GOLDEN LAKE EXPL INC.
WSSTF1.05N/A
N/A
Western Bulk Charterings AS
WCHS5.01N/A
N/A
Winchester Holding Group
TSRYY4.63-0.19
-3.94%
Treasury Wine Estates Ltd.
TCKRF40.13-2.47
-5.80%
Teck Resources Ltd.

CONXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CONXF and FEOVF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CONXF and FEOVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CONXF
1D Price
Change %
CONXF100%
+4.77%
FEOVF - CONXF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AAGFF - CONXF
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
FEERF - CONXF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRSLF - CONXF
10%
Poorly correlated
+9.95%
SMRVF - CONXF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SMRVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SMRVF and GTMLF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMRVF and GTMLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMRVF
1D Price
Change %
SMRVF100%
N/A
GTMLF - SMRVF
28%
Poorly correlated
-17.26%
ASMMF - SMRVF
10%
Poorly correlated
-3.04%
AAGFF - SMRVF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
CONXF - SMRVF
5%
Poorly correlated
+4.77%
EMHLF - SMRVF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More