Advertisement
COOT vs HCWC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COOT is a Hold and HCWC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
COOT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHCWC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- COOT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- HCWC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
COOT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HCWC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- COOT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- HCWC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
COOT (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -10.82% price change this week, while HCWC (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +8.48% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +290.64%.
Reported Earning Dates
HCWC is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Major Diversified (+0.84% weekly)Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.
| COOT | HCWC | COOT / HCWC | |
| Capitalization | 17.9M | 9.68M | 185% |
| EBITDA | -23.16M | 2.33M | -993% |
| Gain YTD | -46.210 | -40.529 | 114% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.98 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 37.9M | 78.3M | 48% |
| Total Cash | 1.44M | 4.69M | 31% |
| Total Debt | 22.7M | 22.1M | 103% |
| COOT | HCWC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 89% | 11 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
Advertisement
COOT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that COOT and MAMA have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that COOT and MAMA's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COOT | 100% | -0.65% | ||
| MAMA - COOT | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.95% | ||
| MDLZ - COOT | 9% Poorly correlated | -2.20% | ||
| ATPC - COOT | 8% Poorly correlated | -3.31% | ||
| HSY - COOT | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.10% | ||
| MKC - COOT | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.49% | ||
More | ||||
HCWC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HCWC and FAMI have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HCWC and FAMI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HCWC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCWC | 100% | +0.24% | ||
| FAMI - HCWC | 23% Poorly correlated | +2.60% | ||
| DAR - HCWC | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.38% | ||
| ABVE - HCWC | 5% Poorly correlated | +20.09% | ||
| BHST - HCWC | -2% Poorly correlated | -0.43% | ||
| COOT - HCWC | -4% Poorly correlated | -0.65% |