FAMI
Price
$0.17
Change
+$0.01 (+6.25%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
6.33M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HCWC
Price
$0.18
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
4.76M
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FAMI vs HCWC

FAMI vs HCWC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FAMI vs. HCWC commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAMI is a Hold and HCWC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (FAMI: $0.17 vs. HCWC: $0.18)
Brand notoriety: FAMI and HCWC are both not notable
FAMI represents the Food: Major Diversified, while HCWC is part of the Food Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FAMI: 264% vs. HCWC: 243%
Market capitalization -- FAMI: $6.33M vs. HCWC: $4.76M
FAMI [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $6.33M. HCWC’s [@Food Retail] market capitalization is $4.76M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $255.67B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Retail] industry ranges from $51.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $3.23B. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Retail] industry is $4.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FAMI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHCWC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FAMI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HCWC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FAMI is a better buy in the long-term than HCWC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FAMI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HCWC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FAMI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HCWC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HCWC is a better buy in the short-term than FAMI.

Price Growth

FAMI (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -12.34% price change this week, while HCWC (@Food Retail) price change was -1.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.88%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Retail industry was +2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

HCWC is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.21% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

@Food Retail (+2.52% weekly)

The food retail industry includes companies that sell food, beverage and household products. Items sold include grocery, gourmet food, fresh produce, and frozen food. Kroger Co., George Weston Ltd., Grocery Outlet Holding Corp., and Sprouts Farmers Markets, Inc. are examples of major food retailers. While e-commerce companies like Amazon have increasingly been ramping-up offerings in the food retail space, several traditional players have also been expanding their online presence to stand their ground against rising competition.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAMI($6.33M) has a higher market cap than HCWC($4.76M). HCWC YTD gains are higher at: -28.685 vs. FAMI (-86.693). HCWC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -547.95K vs. FAMI (-2.35M). HCWC has more cash in the bank: 2.35M vs. FAMI (487K). FAMI has less debt than HCWC: FAMI (15.1M) vs HCWC (16.4M). HCWC has higher revenues than FAMI: HCWC (76.2M) vs FAMI (64.1M).
FAMIHCWCFAMI / HCWC
Capitalization6.33M4.76M133%
EBITDA-2.35M-547.95K429%
Gain YTD-86.693-28.685302%
P/E Ratio13.28N/A-
Revenue64.1M76.2M84%
Total Cash487K2.35M21%
Total Debt15.1M16.4M92%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FAMI: Fundamental Ratings
FAMI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
54
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
96
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FAMIHCWC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FAMI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HCWC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMTK0.220.01
+4.82%
SmartKem Inc.
CCB40.991.08
+2.71%
Coastal Financial Corp
BSM14.950.15
+1.01%
Black Stone Minerals LP
FLNT3.41-0.07
-2.01%
Fluent
TSN57.96-2.69
-4.44%
Tyson Foods

FAMI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FAMI and HCWC have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FAMI and HCWC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FAMI
1D Price
Change %
FAMI100%
+7.78%
HCWC - FAMI
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.23%
DAR - FAMI
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
NATR - FAMI
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.69%
LSF - FAMI
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
HAIN - FAMI
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.40%
More

HCWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCWC has been loosely correlated with ATPC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HCWC jumps, then ATPC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCWC
1D Price
Change %
HCWC100%
+2.23%
ATPC - HCWC
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.70%
FAMI - HCWC
29%
Poorly correlated
+7.78%
DAR - HCWC
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
JVA - HCWC
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
STKH - HCWC
18%
Poorly correlated
-15.19%
More