COPJ
Price
$45.44
Change
+$0.43 (+0.96%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
177.08M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CUT
Price
$28.96
Change
+$0.03 (+0.10%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
30.47M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COPJ vs CUT

COPJ vs CUT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) vs. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT)

Key Takeaways

  • COPJ provides targeted exposure to small- and mid-cap junior copper miners, while CUT offers diversified access to global timber, paper, and packaging companies across the market-cap spectrum.
  • Both ETFs are passively managed with similar expense ratios near 0.75%, but COPJ concentrates on a narrower thematic niche with higher volatility potential tied to copper prices and exploration success.
  • COPJ holds approximately 69 positions focused on copper mining-related businesses, whereas CUT maintains around 65–69 holdings in timber-related equities with individual position caps at 5%.
  • Sector exposure differs sharply: COPJ centers on basic materials through copper miners, while CUT spans consumer cyclical (paper and packaging) and real estate (timber REITs).
  • COPJ rebalances semi-annually and targets exploration- and development-stage firms, contrasting with CUT’s market-cap-weighted approach that emphasizes established timber supply chains.
  • Investors seeking commodity-driven growth in energy transition themes may favor COPJ’s structure, while those preferring steadier exposure to renewable materials and packaging may align with CUT.

Introduction

Investors evaluating specialized natural resources exposure often compare thematic ETFs like COPJ and CUT. These funds do not compete directly but represent distinct strategies within the broader materials sector. COPJ targets junior copper miners essential to electrification and infrastructure, while CUT delivers access to global timber and wood-product supply chains. The comparison helps investors understand differences in risk, diversification, cost, and alignment with long-term commodity and sustainability trends.

Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) Overview

The Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) is a passive, thematic fund launched in February 2023. It seeks to track the Nasdaq Sprott Junior Copper Miners Index, which focuses on mid-, small-, and micro-cap companies deriving at least 50% of revenues or assets from copper mining, exploration, development, and production. The ETF holds approximately 69 securities, predominantly junior miners with limited operating revenue. Top holdings typically include Ero Copper Corp., Trekor Metals Ltd., Atalaya Mining Copper S.A., Faraday Copper Corp., and FireFly Metals Ltd. The portfolio is heavily weighted toward basic materials, with significant geographic concentration in Canada and Australia. The expense ratio stands at 0.75%, and the index rebalances semi-annually with market-cap weighting subject to concentration caps. This structure emphasizes higher-risk, higher-reward exposure to copper supply growth.

Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) Overview

The Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) is a passive fund launched in November 2007. It tracks the MSCI ACWI IMI Timber Select Capped Index, which includes equity securities of companies involved in forest ownership, timberland management, and production of finished timber-based products. The ETF holds approximately 65–69 positions across developed and emerging markets, with single-stock caps at 5% to maintain diversification. Representative top holdings include Smurfit Westrock Plc, International Paper Co., Packaging Corp. of America, Amcor plc, and Weyerhaeuser Co. Sector allocations span consumer cyclical (paper and packaging), basic materials, and real estate (timber REITs). The expense ratio is approximately 0.74–0.76%. The fund employs market-cap weighting with periodic index-driven rebalancing, offering broad exposure to the global timber value chain.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Copper demand is supported by long-term structural drivers including electrification, data-center buildout, and renewable-energy infrastructure. Supply constraints from declining ore grades and permitting delays create potential tailwinds for junior miners. Timber markets face mixed influences from housing cycles, packaging demand tied to e-commerce, and sustainability regulations favoring wood-based materials over plastics. Both sectors respond to macroeconomic factors such as interest rates, global industrial activity, and commodity price cycles, with copper exhibiting greater sensitivity to industrial and technological demand shifts.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, COPJ has displayed higher volatility consistent with its focus on smaller, earlier-stage copper companies whose valuations respond sharply to copper price movements and project milestones. CUT has shown more moderate fluctuations, reflecting exposure to mature timber and packaging firms with steadier cash flows and dividend characteristics. Relative positioning favors COPJ during periods of strong copper fundamentals and infrastructure spending, while CUT may benefit from steady demand for sustainable packaging and wood products amid broader economic stability.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural characteristics, COPJ currently exhibits stronger alignment with high-momentum thematic drivers in copper supply expansion and energy transition demand, combined with its focused diversification profile and cost efficiency for the niche. CUT offers defensive qualities through broader holdings and established supply chains but lower direct exposure to growth catalysts. Tickeron’s AI would assign a higher probabilistic preference to COPJ for investors seeking asymmetric upside within the materials sector, subject to individual risk tolerance and portfolio construction.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
COPJ vs. CUT commentary
Sep 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COPJ is a Hold and CUT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COPJ has more net assets: 177M vs. CUT (30.5M). COPJ has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: COPJ (15.652) vs CUT (-0.367). COPJ was incepted earlier than CUT: COPJ (4 years) vs CUT (19 years). COPJ (0.75) and CUT (0.76) have comparable expense ratios . COPJ has a higher turnover CUT (26.00) vs CUT (26.00).
COPJCUTCOPJ / CUT
Gain YTD15.652-0.367-4,267%
Net Assets177M30.5M580%
Total Expense Ratio0.750.7699%
Turnover59.0026.00227%
Yield9.592.41398%
Fund Existence4 years19 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COPJCUT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
COPJ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CUT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IMKTA83.121.10
+1.34%
Ingles Markets
CMC67.170.55
+0.83%
Commercial Metals Company
WYHG4.550.03
+0.66%
Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited
FCCO34.10-0.05
-0.15%
First Community Corp
SOMN47.35-0.29
-0.61%
Southern Co.

COPJ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COPJ has been loosely correlated with MTAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COPJ jumps, then MTAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COPJ
1D Price
Change %
COPJ100%
+0.95%
MTAL - COPJ
59%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CVV - COPJ
32%
Poorly correlated
-25.36%
SLS - COPJ
22%
Poorly correlated
-14.42%
NAK - COPJ
15%
Poorly correlated
-3.42%
III - COPJ
13%
Poorly correlated
+2.37%
More

CUT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CUT and CLW have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUT and CLW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CUT
1D Price
Change %
CUT100%
+0.09%
CLW - CUT
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.79%
SAP - CUT
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
SON - CUT
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
GPK - CUT
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
AVY - CUT
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
More