Investors seeking metals and mining exposure face a choice between specialized and diversified vehicles. COPJ and XME do not compete directly; instead, they represent complementary strategies within the natural resources sector. COPJ targets junior copper miners with growth potential tied to the energy transition, while XME delivers equal-weighted access to a broader U.S. metals and mining universe. Comparing these ETFs helps investors evaluate trade-offs in thematic purity, cost efficiency, diversification, and positioning amid commodity cycles and macroeconomic shifts.
COPJ seeks to track the Nasdaq Sprott Junior Copper Miners Index, which focuses on mid-, small-, and micro-cap companies deriving significant revenue or assets from copper mining, exploration, development, and production. The ETF holds approximately 20–50 securities, with top holdings typically including names such as Ero Copper Corp., Trek Metals Ltd., and Atalaya Mining PLC. Sector allocation centers almost exclusively on copper-related mining activities. COPJ carries an expense ratio of approximately 0.75% and employs a passive, modified market-cap weighted methodology with semi-annual rebalancing. As a thematic equity ETF launched in February 2023, it emphasizes pure-play junior copper exposure, distinguishing it through its concentrated focus on smaller companies with potential for asset and revenue growth.
XME tracks the S&P Metals and Mining Select Industry Index, representing the metals and mining segment of the S&P Total Market Index. The fund holds around 39 securities in a modified equal-weighted structure, with top holdings spanning companies such as Uranium Energy Corp., Hecla Mining Co., and Centrus Energy Corp. Sector allocations include diversified metals and mining, copper, gold, steel, aluminum, and related sub-industries. XME features a lower expense ratio of 0.35% and follows a passive strategy with quarterly rebalancing. Launched in 2006 and issued by State Street, the ETF provides broad U.S.-listed exposure across market-cap ranges within the metals and mining space.
The metals and mining sector benefits from structural demand drivers, including global energy transition needs that favor copper for electrification and power infrastructure. Broader industrial metals face influences from manufacturing activity, infrastructure spending, and supply constraints. Regulatory developments around mining permits and environmental standards, alongside macroeconomic factors such as interest rate paths and economic growth, shape capital flows. Risks include commodity price volatility, geopolitical tensions affecting supply chains, and cyclical earnings pressure on producers. Both ETFs operate within this environment, with COPJ more sensitive to copper-specific trends and XME reflecting diversified metals performance.
In recent market cycles, COPJ has exhibited higher volatility tied to junior mining dynamics and copper price movements, often amplifying sector rotations during commodity rallies. XME has delivered more balanced participation across metals sub-sectors, with its equal-weighted approach reducing concentration in any single holding. Relative positioning shows COPJ aligned with thematic copper demand growth, while XME captures broader sector momentum through quarterly adjustments. Differences in fund structure influence behavior during earnings seasons and macroeconomic shifts, with COPJ reflecting exploration-stage leverage and XME providing steadier exposure to established producers.
AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Visit the AI Screener to explore data-driven insights for ETFs like COPJ and XME.
Based on observable factors including lower expense ratio, broader diversification across metals sub-industries, established liquidity profile, and quarterly rebalancing methodology, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorable positioning to XME over the longer term. COPJ’s specialized copper focus offers distinct thematic advantages but carries elevated concentration and cost considerations that may influence relative attractiveness depending on copper price momentum and risk tolerance.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| COPJ | XME | COPJ / XME | |
| Gain YTD | 15.652 | 9.814 | 159% |
| Net Assets | 177M | 4.7B | 4% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.35 | 214% |
| Turnover | 59.00 | 48.00 | 123% |
| Yield | 9.59 | 0.32 | 3,040% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 20 years | - |
| COPJ | XME | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COPJ has been loosely correlated with MTAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COPJ jumps, then MTAL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COPJ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COPJ | 100% | +0.95% | ||
| MTAL - COPJ | 59% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CVV - COPJ | 32% Poorly correlated | -25.36% | ||
| SLS - COPJ | 22% Poorly correlated | -14.42% | ||
| NAK - COPJ | 15% Poorly correlated | -3.42% | ||
| III - COPJ | 13% Poorly correlated | +2.37% | ||
More | ||||