COPJ
Price
$45.44
Change
+$0.43 (+0.96%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
177.08M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XME
Price
$113.63
Change
-$1.14 (-0.99%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
4.7B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COPJ vs XME

COPJ vs XME Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) vs. SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME)

Key Takeaways

  • COPJ offers targeted exposure to junior copper miners globally, emphasizing exploration and development-stage companies, while XME provides broader, equal-weighted access to U.S. metals and mining firms across multiple sub-industries.
  • COPJ maintains a higher expense ratio of approximately 0.75% compared to XME’s 0.35%, reflecting its specialized thematic strategy versus XME’s more diversified, lower-cost approach.
  • Structural differences include COPJ’s focus on smaller-cap copper pure-plays (typically 20–50 holdings) versus XME’s modified equal-weighted portfolio of around 39 holdings spanning aluminum, steel, gold, and diversified metals.
  • Both ETFs are passively managed and tied to commodity-related themes, but COPJ carries higher concentration risk in copper price movements and junior mining volatility, while XME spreads exposure across a wider range of metals and U.S.-listed issuers.
  • In the current environment of energy transition demand for copper and broader industrial metals strength, COPJ positions investors for potential upside in junior copper assets, whereas XME offers balanced participation in the metals and mining sector with quarterly rebalancing.

Introduction

Investors seeking metals and mining exposure face a choice between specialized and diversified vehicles. COPJ and XME do not compete directly; instead, they represent complementary strategies within the natural resources sector. COPJ targets junior copper miners with growth potential tied to the energy transition, while XME delivers equal-weighted access to a broader U.S. metals and mining universe. Comparing these ETFs helps investors evaluate trade-offs in thematic purity, cost efficiency, diversification, and positioning amid commodity cycles and macroeconomic shifts.

Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) Overview

COPJ seeks to track the Nasdaq Sprott Junior Copper Miners Index, which focuses on mid-, small-, and micro-cap companies deriving significant revenue or assets from copper mining, exploration, development, and production. The ETF holds approximately 20–50 securities, with top holdings typically including names such as Ero Copper Corp., Trek Metals Ltd., and Atalaya Mining PLC. Sector allocation centers almost exclusively on copper-related mining activities. COPJ carries an expense ratio of approximately 0.75% and employs a passive, modified market-cap weighted methodology with semi-annual rebalancing. As a thematic equity ETF launched in February 2023, it emphasizes pure-play junior copper exposure, distinguishing it through its concentrated focus on smaller companies with potential for asset and revenue growth.

SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) Overview

XME tracks the S&P Metals and Mining Select Industry Index, representing the metals and mining segment of the S&P Total Market Index. The fund holds around 39 securities in a modified equal-weighted structure, with top holdings spanning companies such as Uranium Energy Corp., Hecla Mining Co., and Centrus Energy Corp. Sector allocations include diversified metals and mining, copper, gold, steel, aluminum, and related sub-industries. XME features a lower expense ratio of 0.35% and follows a passive strategy with quarterly rebalancing. Launched in 2006 and issued by State Street, the ETF provides broad U.S.-listed exposure across market-cap ranges within the metals and mining space.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The metals and mining sector benefits from structural demand drivers, including global energy transition needs that favor copper for electrification and power infrastructure. Broader industrial metals face influences from manufacturing activity, infrastructure spending, and supply constraints. Regulatory developments around mining permits and environmental standards, alongside macroeconomic factors such as interest rate paths and economic growth, shape capital flows. Risks include commodity price volatility, geopolitical tensions affecting supply chains, and cyclical earnings pressure on producers. Both ETFs operate within this environment, with COPJ more sensitive to copper-specific trends and XME reflecting diversified metals performance.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, COPJ has exhibited higher volatility tied to junior mining dynamics and copper price movements, often amplifying sector rotations during commodity rallies. XME has delivered more balanced participation across metals sub-sectors, with its equal-weighted approach reducing concentration in any single holding. Relative positioning shows COPJ aligned with thematic copper demand growth, while XME captures broader sector momentum through quarterly adjustments. Differences in fund structure influence behavior during earnings seasons and macroeconomic shifts, with COPJ reflecting exploration-stage leverage and XME providing steadier exposure to established producers.

AI Screener

AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Visit the AI Screener to explore data-driven insights for ETFs like COPJ and XME.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including lower expense ratio, broader diversification across metals sub-industries, established liquidity profile, and quarterly rebalancing methodology, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorable positioning to XME over the longer term. COPJ’s specialized copper focus offers distinct thematic advantages but carries elevated concentration and cost considerations that may influence relative attractiveness depending on copper price momentum and risk tolerance.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
COPJ vs. XME commentary
Sep 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COPJ is a Hold and XME is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XME has more net assets: 4.7B vs. COPJ (177M). COPJ has a higher annual dividend yield than XME: COPJ (15.652) vs XME (9.814). COPJ was incepted earlier than XME: COPJ (4 years) vs XME (20 years). XME (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than COPJ (0.75). COPJ has a higher turnover XME (48.00) vs XME (48.00).
COPJXMECOPJ / XME
Gain YTD15.6529.814159%
Net Assets177M4.7B4%
Total Expense Ratio0.750.35214%
Turnover59.0048.00123%
Yield9.590.323,040%
Fund Existence4 years20 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COPJXME
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
COPJ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XME
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BLYPX40.220.50
+1.26%
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Growth Inv
IIIIX15.19N/A
N/A
Voya International Index Port I
LMPOX31.15N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Small Cap Growth R
COSSX15.16N/A
N/A
Columbia Overseas Value Inst2
NUGIX36.51N/A
N/A
Nuveen Global Dividend Growth I

COPJ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COPJ has been loosely correlated with MTAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COPJ jumps, then MTAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COPJ
1D Price
Change %
COPJ100%
+0.95%
MTAL - COPJ
59%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CVV - COPJ
32%
Poorly correlated
-25.36%
SLS - COPJ
22%
Poorly correlated
-14.42%
NAK - COPJ
15%
Poorly correlated
-3.42%
III - COPJ
13%
Poorly correlated
+2.37%
More