COPP
Price
$42.88
Change
+$0.08 (+0.19%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
289.41M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PHO
Price
$68.49
Change
+$0.42 (+0.62%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
1.91B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COPP vs PHO

COPP vs PHO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP) vs. Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO)

Key Takeaways

  • COPP provides targeted exposure to copper mining companies and physical copper through a passive strategy tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Copper Miners Index, while PHO offers diversified exposure to U.S. water infrastructure and purification companies via the NASDAQ OMX U.S. Water Index.
  • COPP carries a higher expense ratio of 0.66% compared to PHO’s 0.59%, reflecting its specialized thematic focus on a narrower commodity sector.
  • Both ETFs employ passive indexing with periodic rebalancing—semi-annual for COPP and quarterly for PHO—resulting in distinct risk profiles tied to commodity price volatility versus steady infrastructure demand.
  • COPP’s holdings center on global copper producers with recent inclusion of physical copper, offering concentrated sector exposure, whereas PHO spreads across industrials, utilities, and technology firms involved in water conservation.
  • Structural differences position COPP for commodity-driven cycles and PHO for defensive, long-term water resource themes, influencing relative positioning in energy transition and infrastructure investment environments.
  • Investors comparing these ETFs should weigh COPP’s higher concentration risk against PHO’s broader diversification and slightly lower costs within thematic natural resources strategies.

Introduction

Investors seeking thematic exposure to critical materials and essential resources often evaluate specialized ETFs like COPP and PHO. These funds do not compete directly but instead deliver alternative strategies within the broader natural resources sector. COPP targets copper supply-chain participants amid rising demand from electrification and renewable energy, while PHO focuses on water management solutions supporting sustainable infrastructure. Comparing their structures, costs, and positioning helps clarify how each aligns with different macroeconomic drivers such as commodity trends and regulatory priorities in resource efficiency.

Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP) Overview

The Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP) is a passively managed fund that seeks to track the total return performance of the Nasdaq Sprott Copper Miners Index before fees and expenses. The index selects global securities with significant revenue from copper production, development, exploration, and physical copper holdings. COPP holds approximately 30 to 50 constituents and includes an allocation to physical copper added in 2025. Top holdings typically feature major producers such as Freeport-McMoRan Inc. The fund maintains a management fee of 0.65% and total expense ratio of 0.66%. It rebalances semi-annually and trades on Nasdaq as an open-end structure focused on pure-play copper exposure.

Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) Overview

The Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) is a passively managed fund designed to track the NASDAQ OMX U.S. Water Index before fees and expenses. The index comprises U.S. exchange-listed companies that develop products for water conservation, purification, and infrastructure. PHO typically holds around 30 to 40 securities weighted by liquidity with caps on individual positions. Prominent holdings often include firms such as Waters Corp and Ecolab Inc., spanning industrials and utilities. The ETF carries an expense ratio of 0.59% and reconstitutes annually with quarterly rebalancing. Launched in 2005, it operates as an open-end fund on Nasdaq emphasizing water resource themes.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within natural resources themes shaped by global sustainability and infrastructure needs. Copper demand benefits from energy transition initiatives, data center expansion, and electric vehicle adoption, creating structural supply pressures. Water resources face steady demand driven by population growth, regulatory standards for conservation, and industrial efficiency requirements. Macroeconomic factors including interest rate environments, government spending on green infrastructure, and commodity price fluctuations influence capital allocation across these sectors. Regulatory developments around mining permits and water quality standards add layers of risk and opportunity without altering the core structural characteristics of either fund.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, COPP has exhibited higher volatility tied to copper price movements and mining earnings, reflecting its concentrated commodity exposure. PHO has shown more stable characteristics linked to consistent infrastructure spending and defensive water demand patterns. Relative positioning favors COPP during periods of strong commodity momentum and PHO amid broader economic stability or rate-sensitive infrastructure rotations. Both ETFs respond to sector-specific catalysts rather than short-term price fluctuations, with COPP more sensitive to geopolitical supply risks and PHO to steady capital expenditures in utilities and industrials.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into thematic ETFs like COPP and PHO may benefit from exploring this platform.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI would likely favor PHO over COPP in the current environment due to its lower expense ratio, established diversification across water infrastructure holdings, and more consistent positioning within defensive sectors. COPP offers compelling thematic exposure to copper but carries higher costs and greater concentration risk. Probabilistic assessment based on structural efficiency, cost profile, and relative sector momentum suggests PHO provides a marginally stronger risk-adjusted framework for thematic allocation at this time.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
COPP vs. PHO commentary
Sep 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COPP is a Hold and PHO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PHO has more net assets: 1.91B vs. COPP (289M). COPP has a higher annual dividend yield than PHO: COPP (23.183) vs PHO (-2.393). COPP was incepted earlier than PHO: COPP (3 years) vs PHO (21 years). PHO (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than COPP (0.66). PHO has a higher turnover COPP (29.00) vs COPP (29.00).
COPPPHOCOPP / PHO
Gain YTD23.183-2.393-969%
Net Assets289M1.91B15%
Total Expense Ratio0.660.59112%
Turnover29.0034.0085%
Yield1.830.57323%
Fund Existence3 years21 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COPPPHO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
COPP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PHO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FCGMX21.380.15
+0.71%
NYLIM PineStone Global Equity Class R6
NGREX10.73N/A
N/A
Northern Global Real Estate Index
VVOAX27.62N/A
N/A
Invesco Value Opportunities A
FZAMX29.28N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Z
BOSYX17.10N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Sm Cp Val Y

COPP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COPP has been loosely correlated with MTAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COPP jumps, then MTAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COPP
1D Price
Change %
COPP100%
+0.19%
MTAL - COPP
60%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RPC - COPP
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.66%
CVV - COPP
32%
Poorly correlated
-25.36%
SLS - COPP
25%
Poorly correlated
-14.42%
III - COPP
11%
Poorly correlated
+2.37%
More

PHO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHO has been closely correlated with XYL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PHO jumps, then XYL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PHO
1D Price
Change %
PHO100%
+0.62%
XYL - PHO
70%
Closely correlated
+0.38%
FELE - PHO
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
ITRI - PHO
48%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TTEK - PHO
43%
Loosely correlated
+2.18%
ROP - PHO
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.02%
More