The copper sector has drawn sustained investor interest due to its role in electrification and infrastructure trends. Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) and iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) both deliver equity exposure to companies involved in copper production, yet they employ distinct index methodologies. They do not compete head-to-head as identical products; instead, they offer alternative approaches to the same thematic opportunity, allowing investors to select based on concentration, cost, and diversification preferences within the basic materials sector.
COPX is a passively managed exchange-traded fund (ETF) that seeks to track the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. The fund typically holds around 40 securities, with assets concentrated in global copper mining companies. Top holdings often include Hudbay Minerals Inc, Teck Resources Ltd, First Quantum Minerals Ltd, BHP Group Ltd, and Southern Copper Corp. Sector allocation centers almost entirely on basic materials. The expense ratio stands at 0.65%. As a thematic, rules-based product, it rebalances periodically to maintain alignment with the copper miners index, providing targeted exposure without active stock selection.
ICOP is a passively managed ETF designed to track the STOXX Global Copper and Metals Mining Index. It generally contains 46-65 holdings focused on companies engaged in copper and other metal ore mining. Prominent positions frequently feature Freeport-McMoRan Inc, Anglo American PLC, Grupo Mexico SAB de CV, BHP Group Ltd, and Rio Tinto PLC. The portfolio remains heavily weighted toward basic materials while incorporating some diversification across related metals. The expense ratio is 0.47%. Launched in 2023, the fund uses a market-capitalization-weighted methodology with quantitative screens for revenue exposure to the sector.
The copper mining industry operates within the broader basic materials sector, influenced by global demand for the metal in electric vehicles, renewable energy systems, and data center construction. Macroeconomic drivers include industrial production trends, supply constraints from major producing regions, and shifts in capital expenditure by mining firms. Regulatory developments around environmental standards and permitting can affect project timelines, while commodity price cycles tied to economic growth or contraction introduce volatility. Both ETFs position investors for potential long-term structural demand growth, subject to these sector-specific risks and opportunities.
In recent market cycles, the two ETFs have exhibited closely correlated movements driven by copper price trends and earnings from shared holdings. COPX’s narrower focus on copper miners has historically amplified participation in pure copper rallies, while ICOP’s inclusion of diversified metals producers has provided modest buffering during periods of copper-specific weakness. Relative positioning reflects differences in holdings concentration and geographic exposure, with COPX showing higher sensitivity to mid-cap miners and ICOP benefiting from larger-cap stability. Volatility profiles remain comparable, though cost differentials may influence net outcomes over extended holding periods.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover additional opportunities aligned with your investment criteria.
Based on observable structural factors including lower expense ratio, broader holdings diversification, and competitive exposure to the copper theme, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorability to ICOP for investors prioritizing cost efficiency and risk-adjusted positioning within the sector.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| COPX | ICOP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COPX has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COPX jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COPX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COPX | 100% | +0.56% | ||
| BHP - COPX | 84% Closely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| WDS - COPX | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| NEXA - COPX | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.58% | ||
| TKO - COPX | 13% Poorly correlated | -1.29% | ||
| MTAL - COPX | -2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICOP has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICOP jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICOP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICOP | 100% | +0.50% | ||
| BHP - ICOP | 88% Closely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| RIO - ICOP | 86% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| NEM - ICOP | 76% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| MTAL - ICOP | 61% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| AAL - ICOP | 29% Poorly correlated | +3.90% | ||
More | ||||