COPX
Price
$94.59
Change
+$4.66 (+5.18%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
8.6B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IYM
Price
$195.12
Change
+$4.78 (+2.51%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
1.04B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COPX vs IYM

COPX vs IYM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) vs. iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF (IYM)

Key Takeaways

  • COPX offers concentrated exposure to global copper mining companies, tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index with approximately 40 holdings and a 0.65% expense ratio.
  • IYM provides broader U.S. basic materials sector exposure through the Russell 1000 Basic Materials RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index, holding around 38-43 securities at a lower 0.38% expense ratio.
  • Structural differences include COPX's thematic focus on copper versus IYM's diversified materials coverage spanning chemicals, metals, and forestry products.
  • COPX exhibits higher concentration risk due to its pure-play copper theme, while IYM delivers greater sector diversification within U.S. equities.
  • Both ETFs are passively managed with market-cap weighting; IYM benefits from lower costs and domestic focus, whereas COPX captures international copper supply dynamics.
  • Relative positioning favors IYM for cost efficiency and stability in broad materials cycles, while COPX suits investors seeking targeted commodity-linked growth.

Introduction

Investors seeking materials sector exposure often compare thematic and broad-sector ETFs to align with specific risk-return objectives. The COPX and IYM do not compete directly but serve complementary roles: one delivers specialized copper mining access, while the other spans U.S. basic materials. This comparison highlights structural distinctions, cost profiles, and positioning amid ongoing commodity demand and industrial cycles.

Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) Overview

The COPX is a passively managed thematic ETF that seeks to track the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. It holds approximately 40 securities focused on companies engaged in copper mining and related activities worldwide. Top holdings typically include Hudbay Minerals, Teck Resources, BHP Group, Antofagasta, and KGHM Polska Miedz, with significant allocations to Canada, Australia, and other international markets. The fund maintains a 0.65% expense ratio and employs market-cap weighting with periodic rebalancing. Its distinguishing feature is pure-play exposure to the copper value chain, distinguishing it from broader materials vehicles.

iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF (IYM) Overview

The IYM is a passively managed sector ETF designed to track the Russell 1000 Basic Materials RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index. It contains roughly 38-43 holdings representing U.S. companies in chemicals, industrial metals, mining, and forestry. Prominent positions often feature Linde, Newmont, Freeport-McMoRan, Ecolab, and Air Products and Chemicals, with primary exposure to domestic issuers. The ETF carries a 0.38% expense ratio and uses a capped market-cap methodology to manage concentration. Its broad basic materials mandate provides diversified sector representation rather than a single-commodity focus.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The materials sector operates amid fluctuating commodity prices, industrial production trends, and infrastructure investment cycles. Copper demand receives support from electrification, renewable energy, and data center expansion, while broader materials face influences from construction activity, chemical manufacturing, and global supply chains. Regulatory developments around mining permits and environmental standards, along with macroeconomic factors such as interest rates and economic growth, shape capital allocation. Both ETFs respond to these drivers, though COPX remains more sensitive to copper-specific supply constraints.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Across recent market cycles, COPX has demonstrated greater volatility tied to copper price movements and global mining equities. In contrast, IYM has shown relatively steadier behavior through diversified holdings across chemicals and metals. Sector rotation favoring commodities has periodically boosted both, yet IYM's domestic emphasis and lower expense ratio have supported more consistent positioning during periods of economic expansion and contraction. Relative performance differences stem primarily from thematic concentration versus broad-sector diversification.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore opportunities with the AI Screener.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics including cost efficiency, diversification profile, and risk exposure, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to IYM. Its lower expense ratio and broader U.S. materials coverage provide more balanced positioning across market environments compared with the concentrated copper theme of COPX.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
COPX vs. IYM commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COPX is a Buy and IYM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COPX has more net assets: 8.6B vs. IYM (1.04B). COPX has a higher annual dividend yield than IYM: COPX (32.207) vs IYM (27.406). COPX was incepted earlier than IYM: COPX (16 years) vs IYM (26 years). IYM (0.38) has a lower expense ratio than COPX (0.65). COPX has a higher turnover IYM (18.00) vs IYM (18.00).
COPXIYMCOPX / IYM
Gain YTD32.20727.406118%
Net Assets8.6B1.04B824%
Total Expense Ratio0.650.38171%
Turnover21.6718.00120%
Yield2.451.33184%
Fund Existence16 years26 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COPXIYM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COPX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IYM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACVT28.760.13
+0.44%
Advent Convertible Bond ETF
VFMV145.780.16
+0.11%
Vanguard US Minimum Volatility ETF
IRVH19.19N/A
N/A
Global X Interest Rt Vol & Infl Hdg ETF
FIAX17.35-0.03
-0.17%
Nicholas Fixed Income Alternative ETF
TAGG41.89-0.09
-0.21%
T. Rowe Price QM US Bond ETF

IYM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYM has been closely correlated with NEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYM jumps, then NEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IYM
1D Price
Change %
IYM100%
+2.51%
NEM - IYM
75%
Closely correlated
+3.09%
PPG - IYM
70%
Closely correlated
+1.06%
AXTA - IYM
67%
Closely correlated
+1.97%
DD - IYM
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
CMC - IYM
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.58%
More