Ad is loading...
COPX vs LITP
COPX vs LITP Comparison
Open Charts COPX vs LITP
Global X Copper Miners ETF
Price$32.47
Change-$3.93 (-10.80%)
Volume$1.67K
Net Assets2.61B
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$5.02
Change-$0.85 (-14.48%)
Volume$195
Net Assets12.87M
COPX vs LITP Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COPX vs. LITP commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COPX is a Hold and LITP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COPX has more net assets: 2.62B vs. LITP (12.9M). COPX has a higher annual dividend yield than LITP: COPX (-4.662) vs LITP (-12.126). COPX was incepted earlier than LITP: COPX (15 years) vs LITP (2 years). COPX (0.65) and LITP (0.65) have comparable expense ratios . LITP has a higher turnover COPX (14.60) vs COPX (14.60).
| COPX | LITP | COPX / LITP | |
| Gain YTD | -4.662 | -12.126 | 38% |
| Net Assets | 2.62B | 12.9M | 20,271% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.65 | 100% |
| Turnover | 14.60 | 59.00 | 25% |
| Yield | 1.77 | 7.37 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| COPX | LITP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 90% | 19 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
COPX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COPX has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COPX jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COPX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COPX | 100% | -6.91% | ||
| FCX - COPX | 88% Closely correlated | -12.28% | ||
| SCCO - COPX | 87% Closely correlated | -8.09% | ||
| HBM - COPX | 85% Closely correlated | -7.54% | ||
| ERO - COPX | 82% Closely correlated | -9.78% | ||
| BHP - COPX | 71% Closely correlated | -2.92% | ||
More | ||||
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | N/A | ||
| SQM - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -7.96% | ||
| PLL - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | -5.75% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 59% Loosely correlated | -9.88% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.17% | ||
More | ||||