COPX
Price
$88.53
Change
-$0.08 (-0.09%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
7.99B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MGNR
Price
$54.27
Change
-$0.12 (-0.22%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
1.3B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COPX vs MGNR

COPX vs MGNR Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 01, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) vs. American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR)

Key Takeaways

  • Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) offers targeted passive exposure to global copper mining equities, while American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) employs active management across a broader natural resources universe including metals, energy, and related sectors.
  • COPX tracks the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index with approximately 40 holdings and a lower expense ratio of 0.65%, providing cost-efficient access to a concentrated thematic basket.
  • MGNR maintains 49 to 52 holdings with an expense ratio of 0.75% and relies on fundamental research by sub-advisor GLG, LLC, allowing flexibility in security selection within natural resources and related businesses.
  • Both ETFs share overlapping top holdings in copper miners such as Hudbay Minerals Inc and Teck Resources Ltd, yet COPX maintains a narrower focus on copper while MGNR diversifies across multiple resource categories.
  • COPX exhibits higher thematic purity and potentially greater volatility tied to copper price cycles, whereas MGNR provides broader diversification that may moderate sector-specific risks through active allocation.
  • In the current environment of rising demand for critical minerals and inflation-hedging assets, COPX emphasizes structural growth in electrification, while MGNR positions for opportunistic exposure across the natural resources value chain.

Introduction

Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) and American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) represent distinct approaches to resource equity exposure. COPX delivers pure-play passive access to copper miners, while MGNR uses active strategies across a wider natural resources spectrum. Investors comparing these exchange-traded funds (ETFs) seek to understand differences in thematic focus, management style, cost, and diversification. The two vehicles do not compete directly but serve as complementary or alternative options for portfolios targeting commodity-linked growth amid energy transition and macroeconomic shifts.

Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) Overview

Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) seeks to track the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. The ETF holds approximately 40 securities, primarily equity positions in companies engaged in copper mining and related activities. Top holdings typically include BHP Group Ltd, Teck Resources Ltd, Hudbay Minerals Inc, Southern Copper Corp, and First Quantum Minerals Ltd. Sector allocation concentrates on materials, with geographic exposure spanning Australia, Canada, Chile, and other copper-producing regions. The fund maintains a total expense ratio of 0.65% and operates as a passive, market-cap-weighted index-tracking vehicle. Rebalancing follows the index methodology, with quarterly reviews for eligibility and weight adjustments. Liquidity benefits from listing on NYSE Arca and consistent trading volume typical of thematic equity ETFs.

American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) Overview

American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) pursues long-term capital appreciation through active management by sub-advisor GLG, LLC. The ETF typically holds 49 to 52 positions in equity securities of companies primarily engaged in natural resources and related businesses, including metals, energy, agriculture, timber, water, and chemicals. Representative top holdings include Hudbay Minerals Inc, Equinox Gold Corp, Teck Resources Ltd, Range Resources Corp, and Kinross Gold Corp. The portfolio applies top-down and bottom-up fundamental analysis without a fixed benchmark index. The expense ratio stands at 0.75%. MGNR launched in February 2024 and trades on NYSE Arca, with rebalancing driven by active decisions rather than mechanical index rules.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The natural resources sector faces structural demand from electrification, renewable energy infrastructure, and electric vehicle production, particularly for copper. Supply constraints and geopolitical factors continue to influence pricing across metals and energy commodities. Inflationary pressures and capital expenditure cycles support interest in resource equities as potential hedges. Regulatory developments around mining permits and environmental standards add layers of complexity. Broader macroeconomic drivers, including interest rate paths and global industrial activity, affect capital flows into both thematic copper exposure and diversified natural resources strategies.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has demonstrated sensitivity to copper price movements and sector rotation toward materials, resulting in periods of elevated volatility. American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) has shown more measured behavior through active allocation across multiple resource sub-sectors, potentially dampening swings tied to any single commodity. Relative positioning reflects COPX’s concentrated thematic bet versus MGNR’s broader mandate. Earnings cycles of shared holdings such as Teck Resources Ltd and Hudbay Minerals Inc influence both funds, while MGNR’s flexibility allows adjustments during shifts in energy or agricultural markets. Interest rate expectations and commodity trends remain key variables shaping performance divergence in recent weeks and months.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a modest edge to Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) in the current environment. The lower expense ratio, passive efficiency, and focused alignment with copper demand growth from electrification provide observable advantages in cost efficiency and thematic consistency. MGNR’s active approach and broader diversification offer value in risk mitigation, yet the higher fee and less concentrated mandate may temper relative preference under prevailing sector momentum signals.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
COPX vs. MGNR commentary
Sep 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COPX is a Hold and MGNR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COPX has more net assets: 7.99B vs. MGNR (1.3B). COPX (23.737) and MGNR (23.555) have matching annual dividend yield . COPX was incepted earlier than MGNR: COPX (16 years) vs MGNR (3 years). COPX (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than MGNR (0.75). MGNR has a higher turnover COPX (21.67) vs COPX (21.67).
COPXMGNRCOPX / MGNR
Gain YTD23.73723.555101%
Net Assets7.99B1.3B617%
Total Expense Ratio0.650.7587%
Turnover21.6780.0027%
Yield2.070.75275%
Fund Existence16 years3 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COPXMGNR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
COPX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MGNR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBJP36.010.86
+2.44%
Neuberger Japan Equity ETF
NUMV44.100.36
+0.82%
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF
TKNQ25.140.18
+0.73%
Amplify TokenizationTechnologyLeadersETF
KMAR32.180.13
+0.40%
Innovator U.S. Small Cp Pwr Buf ETF -Mar
ETY14.190.04
+0.28%
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund

COPX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COPX has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COPX jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COPX
1D Price
Change %
COPX100%
-0.09%
BHP - COPX
83%
Closely correlated
-0.23%
WDS - COPX
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
NEXA - COPX
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.29%
TKO - COPX
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
MTAL - COPX
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MGNR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGNR has been closely correlated with KGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MGNR jumps, then KGC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGNR
1D Price
Change %
MGNR100%
-0.22%
KGC - MGNR
77%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
PAAS - MGNR
77%
Closely correlated
-0.61%
CDE - MGNR
77%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
AU - MGNR
74%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
CX - MGNR
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
More