COPX
Price
$96.32
Change
+$1.79 (+1.89%)
Updated
Aug 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
8.6B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PICK
Price
$66.83
Change
+$0.96 (+1.46%)
Updated
Aug 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
2.42B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COPX vs PICK

COPX vs PICK Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) vs. iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK)

Key Takeaways

  • Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) offers concentrated exposure to copper mining companies, while iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) provides broader diversification across multiple metals and mining subsectors.
  • COPX maintains a higher expense ratio of 0.65% compared to PICK’s 0.39%, reflecting its narrower thematic focus.
  • COPX tracks approximately 40 holdings with heavy weighting toward pure-play copper producers, whereas PICK holds over 250 securities spanning diversified metals, steel, and copper.
  • Both ETFs are passive, market-capitalization-weighted vehicles that rebalance periodically according to their respective underlying indices.
  • COPX exhibits greater sector concentration in materials, while PICK spreads risk across diversified metals and mining producers.
  • Investors seeking targeted copper exposure may prefer COPX, whereas those seeking broader metals and mining diversification may consider PICK.

Introduction

The Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) and the iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) both provide equity exposure to the metals and mining sector but pursue distinct strategies. COPX targets companies primarily involved in copper extraction and production, while PICK delivers diversified exposure across a wider range of metals including steel, aluminum, and other industrial minerals. These ETFs do not compete directly; instead, they represent alternative approaches for investors seeking commodity-linked equity returns within the same broad industry. In the current market environment, where demand for critical minerals intersects with industrial and energy transition themes, comparing their structural characteristics helps investors align portfolio positioning with specific risk and return objectives.

Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) Overview

The Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) is a passive exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the performance of the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. It holds approximately 40 securities, with a focus on global companies engaged in copper mining. Top holdings typically include Hudbay Minerals, BHP Group, Teck Resources, and First Quantum Minerals, which together account for a significant portion of assets. Sector allocation is overwhelmingly concentrated in materials, often exceeding 95%, with a modest industrials component. The fund charges an expense ratio of 0.65% and employs a market-capitalization-weighted methodology with periodic rebalancing to maintain index alignment. COPX is structured as a thematic equity ETF designed for investors seeking pure-play exposure to the copper mining industry.

iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) Overview

The iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) is a passive fund that tracks the MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers Investable Market Index. It maintains a diversified portfolio of approximately 250 holdings across global metals and mining producers. Major subsector allocations include diversified metals and mining (around 52%), steel (approximately 25%), and copper (roughly 14%). Expense ratio stands at 0.39%. The ETF uses a market-capitalization-weighted approach and rebalances according to the index methodology. PICK offers broad exposure to the extraction and production of various metals and minerals, excluding gold and silver, making it suitable for investors seeking diversified metals sector representation rather than single-commodity concentration.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The metals and mining sector continues to be shaped by long-term demand for industrial metals driven by infrastructure development, electrification, and manufacturing activity. Copper remains central due to its role in electrical infrastructure and renewable energy systems, while steel and diversified metals support broader industrial cycles. Macroeconomic factors such as global economic growth, supply chain dynamics, and regulatory policies around resource extraction influence both ETFs. Capital flows into the sector reflect investor interest in commodities tied to structural trends, though the industry faces risks including commodity price volatility, geopolitical developments affecting major producing regions, and environmental regulations. These elements create an environment where focused versus diversified exposure can lead to differing performance characteristics across market cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, COPX has demonstrated higher sensitivity to copper price movements and specific supply-demand dynamics within the copper mining industry, resulting in potentially elevated volatility relative to broader benchmarks. PICK, with its wider diversification across metals and mining subsectors, has historically exhibited more moderate fluctuations tied to overall industrial metals trends. Both ETFs respond to sector rotation patterns, earnings cycles of major producers, and shifts in commodity demand. COPX tends to amplify exposure to copper-specific catalysts, while PICK provides a buffer through allocations to steel and diversified producers. Relative positioning depends on an investor’s view of copper intensity versus broader metals sector momentum.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors interested in refining ETF selection criteria may explore the platform for additional analytical support.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favor to PICK. Its lower expense ratio, substantially greater number of holdings, and diversified subsector exposure across metals and mining producers provide a more balanced risk profile and cost efficiency. COPX offers compelling targeted exposure but carries higher fees and concentration risk. The probabilistic assessment favors PICK for investors prioritizing diversification and lower ongoing costs within the metals sector.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
COPX vs. PICK commentary
Aug 26, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COPX is a Buy and PICK is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COPX has more net assets: 8.6B vs. PICK (2.42B). COPX has a higher annual dividend yield than PICK: COPX (32.123) vs PICK (29.380). COPX was incepted earlier than PICK: COPX (16 years) vs PICK (15 years). PICK (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than COPX (0.65). COPX has a higher turnover PICK (10.00) vs PICK (10.00).
COPXPICKCOPX / PICK
Gain YTD32.12329.380109%
Net Assets8.6B2.42B355%
Total Expense Ratio0.650.39167%
Turnover21.6710.00217%
Yield2.452.23110%
Fund Existence16 years15 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COPXPICK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COPX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PICK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMZP26.860.41
+1.54%
Kurv Yield Premium Str Amazon ETF
FTXO41.930.14
+0.35%
First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF
RFDA73.850.05
+0.06%
ALPS Dynamic US Dividend Advtg ETF
BGDV31.13-0.05
-0.17%
Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF
TNA71.67-1.45
-1.98%
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X ETF

COPX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COPX has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COPX jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COPX
1D Price
Change %
COPX100%
-0.06%
BHP - COPX
83%
Closely correlated
+0.10%
WDS - COPX
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.10%
NEXA - COPX
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.17%
TKO - COPX
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
MTAL - COPX
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PICK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PICK has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PICK jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PICK
1D Price
Change %
PICK100%
+0.26%
BHP - PICK
90%
Closely correlated
+0.10%
RIO - PICK
89%
Closely correlated
-0.47%
MT - PICK
72%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
CMP - PICK
55%
Loosely correlated
-5.77%
LAR - PICK
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.90%
More