COPX
Price
$85.61
Change
-$2.92 (-3.30%)
Updated
Sep 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
7.87B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
REMX
Price
$68.91
Change
-$1.65 (-2.34%)
Updated
Sep 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
2.07B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COPX vs REMX

COPX vs REMX Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) vs. VanEck Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX)

Key Takeaways

  • COPX tracks the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index, delivering concentrated exposure to approximately 40 global copper mining companies, while REMX follows the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index with roughly 37 holdings focused on rare earth elements and strategic metals producers.
  • Both ETFs are passively managed, equity-based vehicles in the materials sector, but COPX emphasizes copper extraction with heavier weighting toward developed markets such as Canada and Australia, whereas REMX spans a broader set of critical minerals including lithium and tungsten, with notable exposure to China and Australia.
  • COPX carries a higher expense ratio of 0.65% compared to REMX’s 0.53%, affecting long-term cost efficiency for investors seeking sustained thematic allocation within the critical minerals space.
  • Top holdings in COPX include companies such as HBM, TECK, BHP Group Ltd., SCCO, and First Quantum Minerals Ltd., while REMX’s largest positions feature ALB, China Northern Rare Earth Group, Pilbara Minerals Ltd., Lynas Rare Earths Ltd., and MP.
  • COPX offers greater liquidity and scale with higher average daily trading volume, whereas REMX provides a lower-cost entry point for investors targeting strategic metals tied to technology and defense applications.
  • Both funds exhibit volatility linked to commodity price cycles, with COPX more directly sensitive to copper demand from electrification trends and REMX influenced by rare earth supply-chain dynamics and geopolitical factors.

Introduction

The Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) and VanEck Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) represent two distinct thematic approaches within the broader materials sector. They do not compete directly as substitutes but instead provide alternative exposure to critical minerals that support the global transition to clean energy, advanced technology, and infrastructure. Investors often compare these ETFs when evaluating commodity-linked equity strategies, as copper and rare earth elements both play essential roles in electric vehicles, renewable power systems, and electronics, yet they differ significantly in supply dynamics, end-market drivers, and portfolio construction.

Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) Overview

The Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) is a passive, rules-based fund that seeks to track the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. It maintains approximately 40 holdings, with the portfolio heavily allocated to the materials sector (typically over 95%). The fund invests at least 80% of its assets in securities of companies economically tied to the copper mining industry. Top holdings generally include Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM), Teck Resources Ltd. (TECK), BHP Group Ltd., Southern Copper Corp. (SCCO), and First Quantum Minerals Ltd., with additional exposure to Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) and Glencore Plc. Geographic allocation favors Canada and Australia, followed by the United States and select emerging markets. The expense ratio stands at 0.65%, and the fund employs full replication with periodic rebalancing to maintain index alignment. Its structure emphasizes pure-play copper miners alongside select diversified producers.

VanEck Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) Overview

The VanEck Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) is a passive fund designed to replicate the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. It holds approximately 37 securities focused on companies engaged in the production, refining, and recycling of rare earth elements and strategic metals. The portfolio is concentrated in the materials sector, with top holdings typically including Albemarle Corp. (ALB), China Northern Rare Earth Group High-Tech Co Ltd., Pilbara Minerals Ltd., Lynas Rare Earths Ltd., MP Materials Corp. (MP), and Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA (SQM). Country exposure is led by China and Australia, with meaningful allocations to the United States and Chile. The expense ratio is 0.53%, and the fund uses a modified capitalization-weighted methodology with quarterly rebalancing. REMX provides targeted access to the rare earth and strategic metals value chain, including both upstream miners and select downstream processors.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the critical minerals theme, driven by accelerating demand from electrification, renewable energy deployment, electric vehicle adoption, and advanced manufacturing. Copper benefits from its essential role in power transmission, data centers, and EV wiring, with supply constraints arising from declining ore grades and lengthy mine development timelines. Rare earth elements and strategic metals face similar demand tailwinds from magnets used in wind turbines and EVs, alongside semiconductor and defense applications, yet they contend with concentrated processing capacity in China and evolving export regulations. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate expectations, global industrial production trends, and geopolitical tensions continue to influence capital flows into mining equities. Regulatory developments around permitting and environmental standards add another layer of complexity for project execution across both commodity groups.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, COPX has demonstrated stronger relative performance during periods of robust copper price appreciation tied to infrastructure spending and AI-related data center buildouts, reflecting its direct linkage to copper production volumes. REMX has shown more variable results influenced by lithium and rare earth price fluctuations, with sensitivity to supply-chain disruptions and shifts in technology sector capex. Both ETFs exhibit higher volatility than broad equity benchmarks due to their concentrated thematic exposure and commodity price sensitivity. COPX generally offers greater liquidity and scale, supporting tighter bid-ask spreads, while REMX provides a lower-cost structure that may appeal to longer-term allocators focused on strategic metals diversification. Relative positioning favors COPX for investors prioritizing copper-centric growth drivers and REMX for those seeking broader exposure to technology-critical minerals amid evolving global supply dynamics.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors evaluating thematic ETFs like COPX and REMX may find the tool useful for uncovering related equities or complementary opportunities within the materials sector.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including structural strength, cost efficiency, diversification profile, and sector momentum, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic edge to REMX. Its lower expense ratio, combined with exposure to a broader set of strategic metals aligned with technology and defense demand, supports a favorable risk-reward profile in the current environment, though COPX remains compelling for investors with a strong copper-specific thesis and preference for higher liquidity.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
COPX vs. REMX commentary
Sep 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COPX is a Hold and REMX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COPX has more net assets: 7.87B vs. REMX (2.07B). COPX has a higher annual dividend yield than REMX: COPX (23.737) vs REMX (-4.545). COPX was incepted earlier than REMX: COPX (16 years) vs REMX (16 years). REMX (0.53) has a lower expense ratio than COPX (0.65). REMX has a higher turnover COPX (21.67) vs COPX (21.67).
COPXREMXCOPX / REMX
Gain YTD23.737-4.545-522%
Net Assets7.87B2.07B379%
Total Expense Ratio0.650.53123%
Turnover21.6774.0029%
Yield2.071.67124%
Fund Existence16 years16 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COPXREMX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
COPX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
REMX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
APUE47.040.36
+0.77%
ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF
MAYZ36.660.27
+0.73%
TrueShares Structured Outcome May ETF
IRVH18.77-0.04
-0.23%
Global X Interest Rt Vol & Infl Hdg ETF
ISD12.11-0.05
-0.41%
PGIM High Yield
JHI12.61-0.06
-0.44%
John Hancock Investors Trust Capital Stock

REMX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, REMX has been closely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if REMX jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To REMX
1D Price
Change %
REMX100%
-2.57%
LAR - REMX
76%
Closely correlated
-8.74%
ALB - REMX
70%
Closely correlated
-3.43%
SQM - REMX
68%
Closely correlated
-3.60%
MP - REMX
66%
Closely correlated
-1.58%
SLI - REMX
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.76%
More