COPX
Price
$94.53
Change
-$0.06 (-0.06%)
Updated
Aug 24 closing price
Net Assets
8.6B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
REMX
Price
$79.75
Change
-$1.00 (-1.24%)
Updated
Aug 24 closing price
Net Assets
2.33B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COPX vs REMX

COPX vs REMX Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) vs. VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX)

Key Takeaways

  • COPX provides targeted exposure to global copper mining companies, while REMX focuses on rare earth and strategic metals producers, resulting in distinct thematic and commodity sensitivities within the materials sector.
  • Both ETFs follow passive, rules-based index strategies with similar portfolio sizes of approximately 40 and 37 holdings respectively, emphasizing equity exposure to mining and refining operations.
  • COPX carries a higher expense ratio of 0.65% compared to REMX’s 0.53%, influencing long-term cost efficiency for investors seeking sustained thematic allocation.
  • Sector allocations for both funds concentrate heavily in materials, with COPX centered on copper extraction and REMX spanning rare earth elements, lithium, and other strategic minerals critical to technology and energy applications.
  • Liquidity profiles differ, with COPX generally offering greater trading volume and tighter spreads due to its larger asset base, supporting more efficient entry and exit for larger positions.
  • Performance dynamics for both ETFs are driven by commodity price cycles, global industrial demand, and supply chain developments rather than broad equity market movements.

Introduction

Global demand for critical minerals has elevated the relevance of specialized mining ETFs such as COPX and REMX. These funds do not compete directly but instead offer complementary exposure within the broader materials sector, allowing investors to target copper or rare earth and strategic metals according to their views on electrification, technology supply chains, and resource security. Both provide passive access to equity baskets of companies involved in extraction and processing, helping investors navigate the energy transition and industrial trends without holding physical commodities.

Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) Overview

The Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) seeks to track the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. It is a passive, market-capitalization-weighted fund holding approximately 40 equities focused on copper mining activities worldwide. Top holdings typically include companies such as Hudbay Minerals Inc., Teck Resources Ltd., BHP Group Ltd., Antofagasta Plc, and KGHM Polska Miedz SA, with allocations spread across developed and emerging markets, particularly Canada and Australia. The fund maintains a 100% materials sector focus and charges an expense ratio of 0.65%. As an open-ended equity ETF, it employs full physical replication with quarterly index reviews to maintain alignment with the copper mining theme.

VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) Overview

The VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) tracks the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. This passive, modified market-capitalization-weighted fund holds approximately 37 equities engaged in the production, refining, and recycling of rare earth elements and strategic metals. Prominent holdings often feature Albemarle Corp., China Northern Rare Earth Group, Pilbara Minerals Ltd., Lynas Rare Earths Ltd., and MP Materials Corp. Geographic exposure spans Australia, China, and the United States, with a near-total allocation to the materials sector. REMX features an expense ratio of 0.53% and uses physical replication with quarterly rebalancing to reflect changes in the underlying index constituents and weights.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the materials sector amid rising demand for metals essential to electric vehicles, renewable energy infrastructure, and advanced electronics. Copper benefits from grid modernization and electrification trends, while rare earth and strategic metals support magnets, batteries, and defense applications. Macro drivers include global industrial output, supply constraints from concentrated production regions, and policy initiatives promoting domestic sourcing. Risks encompass commodity price volatility, geopolitical tensions affecting mining operations, regulatory changes on environmental standards, and shifts in capital expenditure by major producers. These factors influence capital flows into mining equities across market cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, COPX and REMX have exhibited sensitivity to commodity price movements and sector rotation within materials. COPX tends to reflect broader industrial demand patterns tied to copper, showing responsiveness to economic growth indicators and infrastructure spending. REMX often displays distinct volatility linked to technology supply chains and rare earth pricing dynamics. Relative positioning highlights COPX’s larger scale and liquidity advantages alongside REMX’s modestly lower cost structure. Both funds have navigated periods of commodity strength and contraction driven by global trade flows, earnings from top holdings, and interest rate environments affecting mining project financing.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to refine your ETF research.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural factors including cost efficiency, diversification profile, and alignment with sustained thematic demand, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability to REMX for investors prioritizing lower expense ratios within the strategic metals space. COPX remains a compelling option for those emphasizing copper’s role in electrification and broader liquidity. Selection ultimately depends on individual risk tolerance and specific commodity outlook.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
COPX vs. REMX commentary
Aug 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COPX is a Buy and REMX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COPX has more net assets: 8.6B vs. REMX (2.33B). COPX has a higher annual dividend yield than REMX: COPX (32.123) vs REMX (7.887). COPX was incepted earlier than REMX: COPX (16 years) vs REMX (16 years). REMX (0.53) has a lower expense ratio than COPX (0.65). REMX has a higher turnover COPX (21.67) vs COPX (21.67).
COPXREMXCOPX / REMX
Gain YTD32.1237.887407%
Net Assets8.6B2.33B370%
Total Expense Ratio0.650.53123%
Turnover21.6774.0029%
Yield2.451.98124%
Fund Existence16 years16 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COPXREMX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COPX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
REMX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BNDD96.050.70
+0.73%
Quadratic Deflation ETF
AFIF9.42N/A
N/A
Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF
PEPS32.54N/A
N/A
Parametric Equity Plus ETF
TAN48.32-1.00
-2.03%
Invesco Solar ETF
OILU52.30-1.40
-2.61%
MicroSectorsTM Oil&Gs Exp&Pd 3X Lvg ETNs

REMX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, REMX has been closely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if REMX jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To REMX
1D Price
Change %
REMX100%
-1.24%
LAR - REMX
75%
Closely correlated
-1.90%
ALB - REMX
71%
Closely correlated
-1.21%
SQM - REMX
69%
Closely correlated
+0.45%
MP - REMX
66%
Closely correlated
-4.38%
SLI - REMX
66%
Loosely correlated
-2.02%
More