COPX
Price
$91.25
Change
+$1.35 (+1.50%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Net Assets
8.13B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
URNM
Price
$57.20
Change
+$2.24 (+4.08%)
Updated
Sep 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
2.12B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COPX vs URNM

COPX vs URNM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) vs. Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM)

Key Takeaways

  • Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) and Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) provide targeted equity exposure to distinct mining sectors, with COPX focused on copper producers and URNM on uranium miners and related assets.
  • COPX tracks the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index with approximately 40 holdings and a 0.65% expense ratio, offering broader diversification than URNM's 22-26 holdings and 0.75% expense ratio.
  • Top holdings in COPX include companies such as Hudbay Minerals Inc., Teck Resources Ltd., and BHP Group Ltd., each typically weighted around 5%, while URNM features higher concentration with Cameco Corp. often exceeding 19% and inclusion of physical uranium exposure via the Sprott Physical Uranium Trust.
  • Both ETFs employ passive, rules-based strategies with quarterly or semi-annual rebalancing, but COPX maintains greater geographic spread across developed and emerging markets in the materials sector.
  • COPX generally exhibits lower structural costs and wider holdings, positioning it for potentially steadier exposure to industrial demand trends, whereas URNM incorporates unique physical uranium elements that can influence volatility and yield characteristics.
  • In the current environment, copper demand tied to electrification supports COPX's thematic profile, while nuclear energy interest underpins URNM, creating differentiated risk-return dynamics within the broader mining space.

Introduction

Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) and Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) represent specialized vehicles for investors seeking equity exposure to critical mineral supply chains. These exchange-traded funds (ETFs) do not compete directly but instead offer alternative pathways within the natural resources sector, targeting copper and uranium respectively. Both address investor interest in energy transition themes, where copper supports electrification infrastructure and uranium underpins nuclear power generation. The comparison highlights structural differences in index methodology, portfolio concentration, and cost efficiency, helping investors evaluate which profile aligns with broader portfolio objectives amid evolving commodity cycles.

Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) Overview

Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) is a passive ETF that seeks to track the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. The fund invests at least 80% of its assets in securities of companies involved in the copper mining industry, resulting in approximately 40 holdings. Top positions typically include Hudbay Minerals Inc., Teck Resources Ltd., First Quantum Minerals Ltd., BHP Group Ltd., and Southern Copper Corp., with individual weights around 5%. Sector allocation centers overwhelmingly on materials, with minor exposure to industrials. The expense ratio stands at 0.65%. The strategy employs full replication or sampling of the underlying index, with periodic rebalancing to maintain alignment. Distinguishing features include global reach across developed and emerging markets and a focus solely on copper-related equities without physical commodity holdings.

Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Overview

Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) is a passive ETF designed to track the VettaFi Global Uranium Mining Index. The fund allocates at least 80% of assets to securities of companies engaged in uranium mining, exploration, or related activities, including holdings of physical uranium, resulting in 22-26 positions. Key holdings often feature Cameco Corp. at around 20%, the Sprott Physical Uranium Trust near 13%, NexGen Energy Ltd. around 12%, along with Denison Mines Corp. and others. The expense ratio is 0.75%. The index methodology incorporates both equity miners and physical uranium exposure, with quarterly rebalancing and semi-annual reconstitution. This structure provides thematic exposure to the uranium value chain while maintaining a rules-based, market-capitalization-weighted approach.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The mining sector encompasses commodities essential to global energy and industrial transitions. Copper demand receives support from electric vehicle production, renewable energy systems, and data center expansion, creating structural tailwinds for producers. Uranium benefits from renewed interest in nuclear power as a low-carbon baseload source, influenced by energy security priorities and policy developments in multiple regions. Both themes face risks from commodity price fluctuations, regulatory changes, geopolitical supply constraints, and capital expenditure cycles in mining operations. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate environments and industrial output levels further shape capital flows into these areas over recent market cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent weeks and months, the ETFs have exhibited performance tied to their underlying commodity trends and sector rotations. Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has shown sensitivity to industrial demand signals and earnings from major producers, with positioning that benefits from diversified holdings across multiple jurisdictions. Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) has reflected volatility linked to nuclear policy announcements and physical uranium market dynamics, amplified by its concentrated top holdings and unique exposure mix. Relative positioning reveals COPX offering potentially lower volatility through broader diversification, while URNM may deliver differentiated returns during periods of uranium-specific momentum. Both respond to shifts in commodity prices and macroeconomic conditions without direct overlap in primary exposures.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). The lower expense ratio, greater number of holdings supporting diversification, and alignment with sustained industrial demand themes contribute to this positioning. Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) offers distinct uranium exposure but carries higher costs and concentration risks that may elevate volatility in certain cycles.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
COPX vs. URNM commentary
Sep 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COPX is a Hold and URNM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COPX has more net assets: 8.13B vs. URNM (2.12B). COPX has a higher annual dividend yield than URNM: COPX (27.539) vs URNM (4.208). COPX was incepted earlier than URNM: COPX (16 years) vs URNM (7 years). COPX (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than URNM (0.75). URNM has a higher turnover COPX (21.67) vs COPX (21.67).
COPXURNMCOPX / URNM
Gain YTD27.5394.208654%
Net Assets8.13B2.12B384%
Total Expense Ratio0.650.7587%
Turnover21.6735.0062%
Yield2.073.0668%
Fund Existence16 years7 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COPXURNM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COPX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
URNM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XLKI26.450.28
+1.09%
State Street®TechSelSectSPDR®PrmETF
AAAA30.830.23
+0.76%
Amplius Aggressive Asset Allocation ETF
QTPI25.360.01
+0.02%
North Square Rcim Tax-Advantaged Preferred And Income Securities ETF
IBIC25.67N/A
-0.02%
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term Tips ETF
SMMU50.07-0.02
-0.04%
PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Actv ETF