COPX
Price
$87.51
Change
+$0.23 (+0.26%)
Updated
Sep 21, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
7.38B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XME
Price
$109.01
Change
+$0.33 (+0.30%)
Updated
Sep 21, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
4.43B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COPX vs XME

COPX vs XME Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 01, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) vs. SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME)

Key Takeaways

  • COPX offers concentrated exposure to global copper mining companies, while XME provides broader, modified equal-weighted access to U.S. metals and mining firms across sub-industries including steel, coal, gold, and copper.
  • COPX tracks the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index with approximately 40 holdings and carries a higher expense ratio of 0.65%, whereas XME tracks the S&P Metals and Mining Select Industry Index with about 39 holdings and a lower expense ratio of 0.35%.
  • COPX emphasizes thematic copper demand drivers such as electric vehicles and renewable energy infrastructure, resulting in higher geographic diversification across Canada, Australia, and emerging markets; XME remains predominantly U.S.-focused with greater exposure to steel and coal.
  • Both ETFs are passive index-tracking vehicles suited for sector exposure rather than broad-market allocation, with COPX exhibiting potentially higher volatility due to its single-commodity focus compared to XME’s multi-sub-industry diversification.
  • Structural differences in weighting methodology and holdings concentration influence risk profiles, with XME’s equal-weight approach reducing dominance by any single large-cap name relative to typical market-cap-weighted peers.
  • Investors seeking targeted copper thematic exposure may prefer COPX, while those desiring diversified U.S. metals and mining participation at lower cost may lean toward XME.

Introduction

COPX and XME both target the metals and mining sector but pursue distinct strategies that make them relevant alternatives for investors seeking commodity-related equity exposure. COPX provides specialized access to copper miners globally, while XME delivers diversified coverage of U.S. metals and mining companies. They do not compete directly as identical products; instead, they represent complementary yet differentiated approaches within the same broad sector, allowing investors to align portfolios with specific views on copper demand versus broader mining cycles.

Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) Overview

The Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) is a passive, thematic ETF that seeks to track the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. The fund invests primarily in equities of companies involved in copper mining, exploration, and production worldwide. It holds approximately 40 securities, with top positions typically including BHP Group Ltd, Teck Resources Ltd, Hudbay Minerals Inc, Southern Copper Corp, and First Quantum Minerals Ltd. Sector allocation centers on basic materials, with notable geographic exposure to Canada, Australia, the United States, and select emerging markets. COPX maintains an expense ratio of 0.65% and employs standard index rebalancing aligned with the underlying index methodology. Its structure emphasizes pure-play copper exposure, distinguishing it through thematic focus rather than broad sector coverage.

SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) Overview

The SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) is a passive ETF designed to track the S&P Metals and Mining Select Industry Index using a modified equal-weighted methodology. The fund provides exposure to U.S. companies across sub-industries such as steel, diversified metals and mining, gold, coal, and copper. It typically holds around 39 securities, with holdings distributed more evenly to limit concentration. Top positions often include firms like Hecla Mining Co, Centrus Energy Corp, Freeport-McMoRan Inc, and Newmont Corp. Sector allocation remains heavily weighted toward basic materials, with the vast majority of assets in U.S. equities. XME features an expense ratio of 0.35% and benefits from quarterly index rebalancing that maintains equal-weight characteristics within the eligible universe.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The metals and mining sector operates within a complex environment shaped by global industrial demand, energy transition trends, and commodity price cycles. Copper benefits from structural tailwinds including electrification, renewable energy infrastructure, and electric vehicle adoption, which support long-term consumption growth. Broader metals exposure faces influences from steel production, precious metals dynamics, and energy-related inputs such as coal and uranium. Macroeconomic factors including interest rate expectations, supply chain developments, and regional industrial activity in key markets like China and the United States continue to drive sector sentiment. Regulatory considerations around mining permits and environmental standards add layers of risk, while capital flows into thematic commodities ETFs reflect ongoing investor interest in resource equities.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, COPX has shown sensitivity to copper price movements and global supply-demand imbalances, often exhibiting pronounced responses to industrial production data and infrastructure spending announcements. XME’s broader sub-industry mix has delivered relatively steadier participation across metals rotations, with its equal-weight structure providing ballast against outsized moves in any single holding. During periods of commodity strength, both ETFs have participated in sector rallies, though COPX’s concentrated copper focus has amplified upside in targeted rallies while increasing drawdown potential in downturns. XME’s U.S. emphasis and diversification across steel and precious metals have contributed to distinct volatility patterns compared to pure copper strategies. Relative positioning favors COPX for investors with high conviction in copper-specific catalysts and XME for those preferring balanced exposure within the metals complex.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to refine your ETF research.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a modest edge to XME in the current environment due to its lower expense ratio, modified equal-weight diversification across multiple sub-industries, and established liquidity profile. COPX retains strong positioning for investors prioritizing pure copper thematic exposure and global reach. The probabilistic assessment reflects XME’s cost efficiency and broader risk dispersion as favorable factors for many allocation frameworks, though COPX could gain preference under scenarios emphasizing concentrated copper demand growth.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
COPX vs. XME commentary
Sep 21, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COPX is a Hold and XME is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COPX has more net assets: 7.38B vs. XME (4.43B). COPX has a higher annual dividend yield than XME: COPX (21.990) vs XME (5.030). COPX was incepted earlier than XME: COPX (16 years) vs XME (20 years). XME (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than COPX (0.65). XME has a higher turnover COPX (21.67) vs COPX (21.67).
COPXXMECOPX / XME
Gain YTD21.9905.030437%
Net Assets7.38B4.43B167%
Total Expense Ratio0.650.35186%
Turnover21.6745.0048%
Yield2.070.32656%
Fund Existence16 years20 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COPXXME
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
COPX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XME
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BEEZ34.000.10
+0.29%
Honeytree U.S. Equity ETF (BEEZ)
FUSI50.460.03
+0.05%
American Century Ultrashort Income ETF (FUSI)
XSEP45.19-0.01
-0.03%
FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September (XSEP)
IBHH23.29-0.02
-0.09%
iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHH)
BSVO28.86-0.22
-0.76%
EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO)

COPX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COPX has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COPX jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COPX
1D Price
Change %
COPX100%
+0.77%
BHP - COPX
84%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
WDS - COPX
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.86%
NEXA - COPX
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
TKO - COPX
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
MTAL - COPX
-2%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
More

XME and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XME has been closely correlated with CDE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XME jumps, then CDE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XME
1D Price
Change %
XME100%
-2.37%
CDE - XME
76%
Closely correlated
-1.10%
MP - XME
71%
Closely correlated
-4.29%
NEM - XME
71%
Closely correlated
-0.79%
RGLD - XME
69%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
USAR - XME
67%
Closely correlated
-1.66%
More