COST
Price
$977.45
Change
+$8.89 (+0.92%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
433.48B
48 days until earnings call
PSMT
Price
$111.29
Change
+$0.54 (+0.49%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
3.42B
87 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

COST vs PSMT

Header iconCOST vs PSMT Comparison
Open Charts COST vs PSMTBanner chart's image
Costco Wholesale
Price$977.45
Change+$8.89 (+0.92%)
Volume$1.89M
Capitalization433.48B
PriceSmart
Price$111.29
Change+$0.54 (+0.49%)
Volume$139.6K
Capitalization3.42B
COST vs PSMT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COST vs. PSMT commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COST is a StrongBuy and PSMT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (COST: $977.45 vs. PSMT: $111.29)
Brand notoriety: COST: Notable vs. PSMT: Not notable
Both companies represent the Discount Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COST: 89% vs. PSMT: 62%
Market capitalization -- COST: $433.48B vs. PSMT: $3.42B
COST [@Discount Stores] is valued at $433.48B. PSMT’s [@Discount Stores] market capitalization is $3.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Discount Stores] industry ranges from $822.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Discount Stores] industry is $103.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COST’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePSMT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • COST’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PSMT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PSMT is a better buy in the long-term than COST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COST’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PSMT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PSMT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both COST and PSMT are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

COST (@Discount Stores) experienced а +4.17% price change this week, while PSMT (@Discount Stores) price change was +3.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Discount Stores industry was +3.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

COST is expected to report earnings on Sep 25, 2025.

PSMT is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Discount Stores (+3.15% weekly)

Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COST($433B) has a higher market cap than PSMT($3.42B). COST has higher P/E ratio than PSMT: COST (55.44) vs PSMT (23.32). PSMT YTD gains are higher at: 21.585 vs. COST (7.082). COST has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.9B vs. PSMT (300M). COST has more cash in the bank: 14.8B vs. PSMT (262M). PSMT has less debt than COST: PSMT (248M) vs COST (8.18B). COST has higher revenues than PSMT: COST (269B) vs PSMT (5.17B).
COSTPSMTCOST / PSMT
Capitalization433B3.42B12,650%
EBITDA12.9B300M4,300%
Gain YTD7.08221.58533%
P/E Ratio55.4423.32238%
Revenue269B5.17B5,208%
Total Cash14.8B262M5,649%
Total Debt8.18B248M3,298%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COST vs PSMT: Fundamental Ratings
COST
PSMT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
611
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
634
SMR RATING
1..100
3061
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5845
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3933
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PSMT's Valuation (63) in the Discount Stores industry is in the same range as COST (95) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that PSMT’s stock grew similarly to COST’s over the last 12 months.

COST's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as PSMT (34) in the Discount Stores industry. This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to PSMT’s over the last 12 months.

COST's SMR Rating (30) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as PSMT (61) in the Discount Stores industry. This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to PSMT’s over the last 12 months.

PSMT's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Discount Stores industry is in the same range as COST (58) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that PSMT’s stock grew similarly to COST’s over the last 12 months.

PSMT's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Discount Stores industry is in the same range as COST (39) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that PSMT’s stock grew similarly to COST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COSTPSMT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PSMT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IUSV95.490.28
+0.29%
iShares Core S&P US Value ETF
QCAP23.000.06
+0.28%
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Cnsrv Buffr ETF - Apr
MYI10.53N/A
N/A
Blackrock Muniyield Quality Fund III
VMAX51.08N/A
N/A
Hartford US Value ETF
CNYA30.30-0.03
-0.10%
iShares MSCI China A ETF

PSMT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PSMT and BMRRY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSMT and BMRRY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSMT
1D Price
Change %
PSMT100%
+0.49%
BMRRY - PSMT
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
BJ - PSMT
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
COST - PSMT
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
TBBB - PSMT
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.95%
WMMVY - PSMT
25%
Poorly correlated
+6.22%
More