COST
Price
$935.03
Change
+$8.97 (+0.97%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
414.67B
61 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PSMT
Price
$186.24
Change
-$0.43 (-0.23%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
5.74B
96 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COST vs PSMT

COST vs PSMT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COST vs. PSMT commentary
Jul 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COST is a Buy and PSMT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 25, 2026
Stock price -- (COST: $926.06 vs. PSMT: $186.67)
Brand notoriety: COST: Notable vs. PSMT: Not notable
Both companies represent the Discount Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COST: 45% vs. PSMT: 62%
Market capitalization -- COST: $414.67B vs. PSMT: $5.74B
COST [@Discount Stores] is valued at $414.67B. PSMT’s [@Discount Stores] market capitalization is $5.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Discount Stores] industry ranges from $871.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Discount Stores] industry is $156.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COST’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePSMT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • COST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PSMT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PSMT is a better buy in the long-term than COST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COST’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PSMT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COST’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • PSMT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COST is a better buy in the short-term than PSMT.

Price Growth

COST (@Discount Stores) experienced а -2.06% price change this week, while PSMT (@Discount Stores) price change was -1.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Discount Stores industry was -2.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

COST is expected to report earnings on Sep 24, 2026.

PSMT is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Discount Stores (-2.20% weekly)

Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COST($415B) has a higher market cap than PSMT($5.74B). COST has higher P/E ratio than PSMT: COST (47.03) vs PSMT (35.78). PSMT YTD gains are higher at: 52.860 vs. COST (7.692). COST has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.5B vs. PSMT (335M). PSMT has less debt than COST: PSMT (325M) vs COST (8.14B). COST has higher revenues than PSMT: COST (294B) vs PSMT (5.69B).
COSTPSMTCOST / PSMT
Capitalization415B5.74B7,227%
EBITDA14.5B335M4,328%
Gain YTD7.69252.86015%
P/E Ratio47.0335.78131%
Revenue294B5.69B5,166%
Total CashN/A322M-
Total Debt8.14B325M2,503%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COST vs PSMT: Fundamental Ratings
COST
PSMT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7985
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
168
SMR RATING
1..100
3465
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5939
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6114
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PSMT's Valuation (72) in the Discount Stores industry is in the same range as COST (98) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that PSMT’s stock grew similarly to COST’s over the last 12 months.

PSMT's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Discount Stores industry is in the same range as COST (16) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that PSMT’s stock grew similarly to COST’s over the last 12 months.

COST's SMR Rating (34) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as PSMT (65) in the Discount Stores industry. This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to PSMT’s over the last 12 months.

PSMT's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Discount Stores industry is in the same range as COST (59) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that PSMT’s stock grew similarly to COST’s over the last 12 months.

PSMT's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Discount Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COST (61) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that PSMT’s stock grew somewhat faster than COST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COSTPSMT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PSMT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SBMLX20.80N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Mid Cap C
DCCIX36.12N/A
N/A
Nomura Small Cap Core I
BGALX16.65N/A
N/A
Baillie Gifford Global Alpha Equities 4
DMSZX9.94N/A
N/A
Destinations Multi Strategy Alts Z
PGUAX16.98N/A
N/A
Virtus Duff & Phelps Global Infras A

COST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COST has been loosely correlated with WMT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COST jumps, then WMT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COST
1D Price
Change %
COST100%
-0.13%
WMT - COST
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.85%
TGT - COST
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.49%
PSMT - COST
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
DG - COST
19%
Poorly correlated
-4.22%
OLLI - COST
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.82%
More

PSMT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSMT has been loosely correlated with WMT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PSMT jumps, then WMT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSMT
1D Price
Change %
PSMT100%
+0.28%
WMT - PSMT
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.85%
TGT - PSMT
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.49%
DLTR - PSMT
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.68%
COST - PSMT
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
OLLI - PSMT
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.82%
More