Advertisement
COST vs SFM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COST is a StrongBuy and SFM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
COST’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileSFM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- COST’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
- SFM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
COST’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- COST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- SFM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
COST (@Discount Stores) experienced а +3.80% price change this week, while SFM (@Food Retail) price change was +1.10% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Discount Stores industry was -0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.81%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Retail industry was -0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.95%.
Reported Earning Dates
COST is expected to report earnings on May 29, 2025.
SFM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Discount Stores (-0.83% weekly)Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.
@Food Retail (-0.37% weekly)The food retail industry includes companies that sell food, beverage and household products. Items sold include grocery, gourmet food, fresh produce, and frozen food. Kroger Co., George Weston Ltd., Grocery Outlet Holding Corp., and Sprouts Farmers Markets, Inc. are examples of major food retailers. While e-commerce companies like Amazon have increasingly been ramping-up offerings in the food retail space, several traditional players have also been expanding their online presence to stand their ground against rising competition.
| COST | SFM | COST / SFM | |
| Capitalization | 466B | 6.44B | 7,234% |
| EBITDA | 12.6B | 621M | 2,029% |
| Gain YTD | 15.056 | 34.682 | 43% |
| P/E Ratio | 59.65 | 25.46 | 234% |
| Revenue | 264B | 6.84B | 3,861% |
| Total Cash | 13.2B | 202M | 6,535% |
| Total Debt | 8.04B | 1.66B | 484% |
COST | SFM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 79 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 96 Overvalued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 6 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 29 | 28 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 32 | 16 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SFM's Valuation (92) in the Food Retail industry is in the same range as COST (96) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that SFM’s stock grew similarly to COST’s over the last 12 months.
COST's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as SFM (6) in the Food Retail industry. This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to SFM’s over the last 12 months.
SFM's SMR Rating (28) in the Food Retail industry is in the same range as COST (29) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that SFM’s stock grew similarly to COST’s over the last 12 months.
COST's Price Growth Rating (29) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as SFM (39) in the Food Retail industry. This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to SFM’s over the last 12 months.
SFM's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Food Retail industry is in the same range as COST (32) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that SFM’s stock grew similarly to COST’s over the last 12 months.
| COST | SFM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 49% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 32% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 29% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 77% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ACV | 22.28 | 0.19 | +0.86% |
| Virtus Diversified Income & Convertible Fund | |||
| XTJL | 35.45 | 0.29 | +0.81% |
| Innovator US Equity Acclrtd Pls ETF Jul | |||
| CGXU | 26.62 | 0.15 | +0.57% |
| Capital Group International Focus Eq ETF | |||
| GCV | 3.74 | 0.02 | +0.54% |
| Gabelli Convertible and Income Securities Fund (The) | |||
| KOKU | 106.41 | N/A | N/A |
| Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF | |||
SFM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFM has been loosely correlated with NGVC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SFM jumps, then NGVC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SFM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFM | 100% | -2.32% | ||
| NGVC - SFM | 33% Loosely correlated | -1.84% | ||
| KR - SFM | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.10% | ||
| VLGEA - SFM | 25% Poorly correlated | -3.23% | ||
| IMKTA - SFM | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.54% | ||
| WMK - SFM | 17% Poorly correlated | -1.03% | ||
More | ||||