Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
COSZX vs HFQRX
COSZX vs HFQRX Comparison
Open Charts COSZX vs HFQRX
COSZX vs HFQRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COSZX vs. HFQRX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COSZX is a Buy and HFQRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 7.98B vs. COSZX (6.91B). HFQRX pays higher dividends than COSZX: HFQRX (6.08) vs COSZX (4.46). COSZX was incepted earlier than HFQRX: COSZX (18 years) vs HFQRX (11 years). COSZX (0.91) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.69). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 175.00 vs. COSZX (57.00). COSZX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFQRX: COSZX (2000) vs HFQRX (1000000). HFQRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.33 vs. COSZX (10.07). HFQRX return over 5 years is better than : 80.34 vs. COSZX (68.06).
| COSZX | HFQRX | COSZX / HFQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.69 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.69 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.289 | 18.094 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.91B | 7.98B | 87% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.46 | 6.08 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.07 | 24.33 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.07 | 75.20 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.06 | 80.34 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.68 | 136.93 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement