Advertisement
COTY vs NUS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COTY is a Hold and NUS is a Hold.
Momentum Indicator for COTY turns positive, indicating new upward trend
COTY saw its Momentum Indicator move above the 0 level on October 01, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new upward move. Traders may want to consider buying the stock or buying call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 84 similar instances where the indicator turned positive. In 62 of the 84 cases, the stock moved higher in the following days. The odds of a move higher are at 74%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
COTY moved above its 50-day moving average on October 06, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for COTY crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 12, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 11 of 18 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 61%.
Following a +3.88% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where COTY advanced for three days, in 197 of 282 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 70%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 105 of 163 cases where COTY Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 64%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day RSI Indicator for COTY moved out of overbought territory on November 03, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 29 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 24 of the 29 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 83%.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 22 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
COTY broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 15, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 12 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.022) is normal, around the industry mean (21.072). P/E Ratio (-4.957) is within average values for comparable stocks, (16.552). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.182) is also within normal values, averaging (1.518). COTY's Dividend Yield (0.144) is considerably higher than the industry average of (0.033). P/S Ratio (0.397) is also within normal values, averaging (1.902).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 38 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. COTY’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 75 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 95 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. COTY’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 87, placing this stock worse than average.
NUS's RSI Oscillator recovers from overbought zone
The 10-day RSI Indicator for NUS moved out of overbought territory on October 19, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. Traders may want to look at selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 25 instances where the indicator moved out of the overbought zone. In 21 of the 25 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a move down at 84%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for NUS turned negative on October 23, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 40 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 28 of the 40 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 70%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where NUS declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 79%.
NUS broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 12, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for NUS entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 38 of 67 cases where NUS's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 57%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 04, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on NUS as a result. In 59 of 93 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 63%.
NUS moved above its 50-day moving average on November 04, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for NUS crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on November 04, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 10 of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 62%.
Following a +1.49% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where NUS advanced for three days, in 180 of 273 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 66%.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 22 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.448) is normal, around the industry mean (21.072). P/E Ratio (-1.119) is within average values for comparable stocks, (16.552). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.170) is also within normal values, averaging (1.518). Dividend Yield (0.048) settles around the average of (0.033) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.165) is also within normal values, averaging (1.902).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 63 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. NUS’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 97 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. NUS’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 87, placing this stock worse than average.
COTY | NUS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 39 | 85 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 12 Undervalued | 22 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
COTY's Valuation (12) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as NUS (22). This means that COTY’s stock grew similarly to NUS’s over the last 12 months.
COTY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as NUS (100). This means that COTY’s stock grew similarly to NUS’s over the last 12 months.
COTY's SMR Rating (95) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as NUS (97). This means that COTY’s stock grew similarly to NUS’s over the last 12 months.
COTY's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as NUS (63). This means that COTY’s stock grew similarly to NUS’s over the last 12 months.
COTY's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as NUS (98). This means that COTY’s stock grew similarly to NUS’s over the last 12 months.
| COTY | NUS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 9 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 84% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
COTY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while NUS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- COTY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NUS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
COTY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NUS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- COTY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- NUS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
COTY (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +3.27% price change this week, while NUS (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +4.83% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +1.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.
Reported Earning Dates
COTY is expected to report earnings on Feb 09, 2027.
NUS is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2027.
Industries' Descriptions
@Household/Personal Care (+1.06% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
Advertisement
COTY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COTY has been loosely correlated with EL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COTY jumps, then EL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COTY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COTY | 100% | +5.47% | ||
| EL - COTY | 49% Loosely correlated | +6.31% | ||
| EPC - COTY | 36% Loosely correlated | +6.19% | ||
| PG - COTY | 34% Loosely correlated | +3.25% | ||
| KVUE - COTY | 33% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ELF - COTY | 33% Loosely correlated | +1.91% | ||
More | ||||
NUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NUS has been loosely correlated with SPB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NUS jumps, then SPB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NUS | 100% | +6.17% | ||
| SPB - NUS | 40% Loosely correlated | +7.72% | ||
| EPC - NUS | 39% Loosely correlated | +6.19% | ||
| PG - NUS | 31% Poorly correlated | +3.25% | ||
| HNST - NUS | 28% Poorly correlated | +2.07% | ||
| COTY - NUS | 27% Poorly correlated | +5.47% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TSLZ | 9.97 | 0.60 | +6.40% |
| T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) | |||
| UIVM | 75.22 | 1.82 | +2.49% |
| VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) | |||
| QUIZ | 28.55 | 0.65 | +2.33% |
| Zacks Quality International ETF (QUIZ) | |||
| DVQQ | 30.22 | 0.27 | +0.90% |
| WEBs QQQ Defined Volatility ETF (DVQQ) | |||
| SMIG | 32.55 | 0.18 | +0.57% |
| Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) | |||