COTY
Price
$7.54
Change
+$0.07 (+0.94%)
Updated
Nov 5, 04:00 PM (EDT)
One day until earnings call
UG
Price
$12.94
Change
+$0.25 (+1.97%)
Updated
Nov 5, 01:13 PM (EDT)
One day until earnings call
Ad is loading...

COTY vs UG

Header iconCOTY vs UG Comparison
Open Charts COTY vs UGBanner chart's image
COTY
Price$7.54
Change+$0.07 (+0.94%)
Volume$470.94K
CapitalizationN/A
United-Guardian
Price$12.94
Change+$0.25 (+1.97%)
Volume$131
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
COTY vs UG Comparison Chart
Loading...
COTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
UG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
COTY vs. UG commentary
Nov 05, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COTY is a Hold and UG is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 05, 2024
Stock price -- (COTY: $7.47 vs. UG: $12.73)
Brand notoriety: COTY and UG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COTY: 147% vs. UG: 78%
Market capitalization -- COTY: $10.64B vs. UG: $36.07M
COTY [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $10.64B. UG’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $36.07M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $381.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $24.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COTY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • COTY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UG is a better buy in the long-term than COTY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COTY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COTY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • UG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both COTY and UG are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

COTY (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -2.61% price change this week, while UG (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -6.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -1.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

COTY is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

UG is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (-1.41% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COTY($10.6B) has a higher market cap than UG($36.1M). COTY has higher P/E ratio than UG: COTY (33.97) vs UG (14.02). UG YTD gains are higher at: 87.171 vs. COTY (-39.855). COTY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.22B vs. UG (2.97M). COTY has more cash in the bank: 450M vs. UG (9.09M). UG has less debt than COTY: UG (4.66K) vs COTY (4.01B). COTY has higher revenues than UG: COTY (6.01B) vs UG (10.9M).
COTYUGCOTY / UG
Capitalization10.6B36.1M29,363%
EBITDA1.22B2.97M41,226%
Gain YTD-39.85587.171-46%
P/E Ratio33.9714.02242%
Revenue6.01B10.9M55,138%
Total Cash450M9.09M4,948%
Total Debt4.01B4.66K85,944,206%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COTY vs UG: Fundamental Ratings
COTY
UG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5254
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8734
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8739
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
448
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UG's Valuation (17) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is significantly better than the same rating for COTY (92). This means that UG’s stock grew significantly faster than COTY’s over the last 12 months.

UG's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as COTY (100). This means that UG’s stock grew similarly to COTY’s over the last 12 months.

UG's SMR Rating (34) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COTY (87). This means that UG’s stock grew somewhat faster than COTY’s over the last 12 months.

UG's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COTY (87). This means that UG’s stock grew somewhat faster than COTY’s over the last 12 months.

COTY's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UG (48). This means that COTY’s stock grew somewhat faster than UG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COTYUG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
COTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
UG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UST42.730.50
+1.18%
ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury
RSPD51.540.29
+0.56%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Wt Cnsm Disc ETF
SLX67.760.35
+0.52%
VanEck Steel ETF
MUB107.160.40
+0.37%
iShares National Muni Bond ETF
ILCB78.84-0.13
-0.16%
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF

COTY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COTY has been loosely correlated with LRLCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COTY jumps, then LRLCY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COTY
1D Price
Change %
COTY100%
-0.13%
LRLCY - COTY
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
IPAR - COTY
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.86%
EL - COTY
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
BDRFY - COTY
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
ELF - COTY
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
More