COTY
Price
$5.58
Change
-$0.17 (-2.96%)
Updated
Feb 14 closing price
Capitalization
10.64B
86 days until earnings call
UL
Price
$54.89
Change
-$1.07 (-1.91%)
Updated
Feb 14 closing price
Capitalization
125.74B
68 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

COTY vs UL

Header iconCOTY vs UL Comparison
Open Charts COTY vs ULBanner chart's image
COTY
Price$5.58
Change-$0.17 (-2.96%)
Volume$8.36M
Capitalization10.64B
Unilever
Price$54.89
Change-$1.07 (-1.91%)
Volume$2.5M
Capitalization125.74B
COTY vs UL Comparison Chart
Loading...
COTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COTY vs. UL commentary
Feb 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COTY is a StrongBuy and UL is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 15, 2025
Stock price -- (COTY: $5.58 vs. UL: $54.89)
Brand notoriety: COTY and UL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COTY: 143% vs. UL: 92%
Market capitalization -- COTY: $10.64B vs. UL: $125.74B
COTY [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $10.64B. UL’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $125.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $381.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $25.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COTY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • COTY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, UL is a better buy in the long-term than COTY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COTY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COTY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • UL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UL is a better buy in the short-term than COTY.

Price Growth

COTY (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -17.46% price change this week, while UL (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -5.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +2.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

COTY is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

UL is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+2.11% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UL($126B) has a higher market cap than COTY($10.6B). COTY has higher P/E ratio than UL: COTY (33.97) vs UL (18.03). UL YTD gains are higher at: -3.192 vs. COTY (-19.828). UL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12B vs. COTY (1.22B). UL has more cash in the bank: 6.11B vs. COTY (450M). COTY has less debt than UL: COTY (4.01B) vs UL (28.6B). UL has higher revenues than COTY: UL (59.6B) vs COTY (6.01B).
COTYULCOTY / UL
Capitalization10.6B126B8%
EBITDA1.22B12B10%
Gain YTD-19.828-3.192621%
P/E Ratio33.9718.03188%
Revenue6.01B59.6B10%
Total Cash450M6.11B7%
Total Debt4.01B28.6B14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COTY vs UL: Fundamental Ratings
COTY
UL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
656
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10060
SMR RATING
1..100
8598
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8955
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3828
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UL's Valuation (29) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COTY (88). This means that UL’s stock grew somewhat faster than COTY’s over the last 12 months.

UL's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COTY (100). This means that UL’s stock grew somewhat faster than COTY’s over the last 12 months.

COTY's SMR Rating (85) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as UL (98). This means that COTY’s stock grew similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.

UL's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COTY (89). This means that UL’s stock grew somewhat faster than COTY’s over the last 12 months.

UL's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as COTY (38). This means that UL’s stock grew similarly to COTY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COTYUL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
29%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
COTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GVAL23.170.21
+0.90%
Cambria Global Value ETF
NUSC43.280.06
+0.14%
Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF
SCHF19.960.01
+0.05%
Schwab International Equity ETF™
KOCG29.42N/A
N/A
FIS Knights of Columbus Global Blf ETF
RSPF74.86-0.01
-0.01%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Fincl ETF

COTY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COTY has been loosely correlated with LRLCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COTY jumps, then LRLCY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COTY
1D Price
Change %
COTY100%
-2.96%
LRLCY - COTY
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
IPAR - COTY
47%
Loosely correlated
-5.14%
BDRFY - COTY
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.73%
EL - COTY
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.41%
LRLCF - COTY
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
More